There we go again...
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 21 mrt. 2008 11:42
Subject: RE: Re: [users] Any Pllans for an e-mail Client? (verification)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<http://www.spamarrest.com/a2?ZGL3BQHjBQchnJ1uoaE1nKANM21unJjhL29gBxcuL2fj>
[image:
Sender Verification] Dear Correspondent,
I am attempting to use Spam Arrest to control the incursion of 'spam' into
my e-mail box. In order to assure that your correspondence gets through to
me, you need to send back a reply only this one time, so I can enter you
into my 'authorized list.'
Thank you for your patience in helping me to manage my online information
flow.
Regards
JSB
Please click the link below to complete the verification process.
You have to do this only once.
http://www.spamarrest.com/a2?ZGL3BQHjBQchnJ1uoaE1nKANM21unJjhL29gBxcuL2fj
You are receiving this message in response to your email to Jack, a Spam
Arrest customer.
Spam Arrest requests that senders verify themselves before their email is
delivered.
When you click the above link, you will be taken to a page with a graphic on
it. Simply read the word in the graphic, type it into the form, and you're
verified.
You have to do this only once per Spam Arrest customer.
------------------------------------------------------------
Below are the complete headers of the message that this email was generated
in response to.
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mta22.srv.hcvlny.cv.net
(mta22.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.5.183]) by mstr8.srv.hcvlny.cv.net
(Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007))
with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 06:38:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.sigmaxi.net
(66-162-201-66.static.twtelecom.net [66.162.201.66])
by mta22.srv.hcvlny.cv.net
(Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007))
with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (ORCPT [EMAIL PROTECTED]); Fri,
21 Mar 2008 06:38:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mail.sigmaxi.net with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
id <16GRX0RQ>; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 06:38:02 -0400
Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.186])
by mail.sigmaxi.net with SMTP
(Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13)
id 16GRX0RP; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 06:37:55 -0400
Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c27so711765rvf.35 for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 03:37:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.170.12 with SMTP id s12mr1230655rve.101.1206095872740; Fri,
21 Mar 2008 03:37:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.141.48.3 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 03:37:52 -0700 (PDT)
Content-return: allowed
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 11:37:52 +0100
From: Guy Voets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [users] Any Pllans for an e-mail Client?
In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="Boundary_(ID_+K1xpIjNFHq4hoBoZ/ccUw)"
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com;
s=beta;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
bh=CdAuOZm/pXqu0Sa9eCMKF35b+puMA+dpWDERtbM7QuQ=;
b=ryOqslYiz7VQGVXFjTnZSKSpwrc0b+tkXrkfAUAOl5uMnMdp9JeJuTwARXTno0AtN+7t73BOufBjUYKfyzUj7sHOHAjEeCf5NR73dYuOJecLc9YQ/8CqnNeHPudj59l7OrdanFhiTFJMq18eOwuXvIAYdYlvwR29x+9vqakPcQU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
b=P+jx2M/yCOqRgSOXKsFDGl3YFtyjpHaS78U3iYSDfyvE7kcih9UfVP3D6XNiXIMy/7PiBG2gLMg83+9tLtNZSr8YQ2ohYSyPX8Q1IsTeoCU9KBxYYNKu0GwlKqpTiq0EwEY9X+3akw9jl+RZaJISbK62Yhz0fDvYECgjRpLqjFI=
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Original-recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received-SPF: pass(gmail.com: domain of
_spf.google.com designates 209.85.198.186 as permitted sender)
--
Guy
using dutch OOo 2.3 m221 on a iMac Intel DualCore Tiger
and brazilian OOo SRC 680 m241 on an Intel MacBook Pro Leopard
-- please reply only to [email protected] --
Dodoes can't afford to have headaches
