In a message dated 2008.05.14 06:24 -0500, Brian Barker wrote:
[Case:A]
If you want the row height to adjust to its contents (and be no larger),
[Action:A]
select "Fit to size" and leave the height in the box at something suitably small.
[Case:B]
If you want the row height to adjust to its contents but to have a particular minimum size,
[Action:B]
select "Fit to size" and set the minimum height in the box.
Sorry to be dense, but I read, and re-read, and still wondered How are these different? Doesn't the condition "If you want the row height to adjust to its contents" *imply* "and be no larger"? In both of your cases, doesn't "Fit to size" mean:
(a) the row size will be at least ("particular minimum size") whatever is specified with "Fit to size", and
(b) it will grow as needed (but "no larger") to accommodate the row's contents? - or have I missed something? -- John --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
