ANNULER !
2008/5/14 John Kaufmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In a message dated 2008.05.14 06:24 -0500, Brian Barker wrote:
>
> [Case:A]
>
> > If you want the row height to adjust to its contents (and be no larger),
> >
> [Action:A]
>
> > select "Fit to size" and
> > leave the height in the box at something suitably small.
> >
>
> [Case:B]
>
> > If you want the row height to adjust to its contents but to have a
> > particular minimum size,
> >
> [Action:B]
>
> > select "Fit to size" and
> > set the minimum height in the box.
> >
>
> Sorry to be dense, but I read, and re-read, and still wondered How are
> these different? Doesn't the condition "If you want the row height to
> adjust to its contents" *imply* "and be no larger"? In both of your cases,
> doesn't "Fit to size" mean:
>
> (a) the row size will be at least ("particular minimum size") whatever is
> specified with "Fit to size", and
> (b) it will grow as needed (but "no larger") to accommodate the row's
> contents?
>
> - or have I missed something?
> --
> John
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
