Jim Allan wrote:
Mike wrote:
I know the Royal Bank of Scotland had a system that only worked with IE
but their new system works with any browser. I didn't use the old
system because I didn't have IE and, even if I had, I wouldn't trust any
Windows system for accessing my bank account. It amazes me that anyone
would use an insecure system to access confidential data.
Maybe you are very easily amazed.
The majority of bank users do trust the Windows system to do their
banking, and nothing bad happens. That’s a fact.
Can you justify your paranoia with some statistics about the horrible
things you believe are happening, or admit that it is just unjustified
paranoia. Horrible things that “might” happen on a less secure system
don’t impress.
This is the kind of ranting that makes people tend to disbelieve Linux
folk on every issue. If they are already prejudiced against Linux,
then this only confirms their prejudices.
Made-up example: “I’ve never had any problems with automated banking
under Windows, don’t know anyone who has, but this crazy Linux fellow
is terrified of using Windows for banking.”
Jim Allan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Jim Allan: Due to MSFT"s own PRONOUNCEMENTS about its lousy
security, nobody in their right mind should be using Windows for
banking, unless their bank ITSELF can guarantee their security!!! Mine
can and does have its own security, but I still do NOT do banking on
line! :-(
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
