On 11 Jul 2008 at 7:48, NoOp wrote:
...
> Nope, the list doesn't strip out any headers:
> http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=users&msgNo=183129&raw=true
> http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=users&msgNo=183112&raw=true
> http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=users&msgNo=182770&raw=true
> http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=users&msgNo=183081&raw=true
> http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=users&msgNo=183031&raw=true
I see the archived mails do have full headers.
However, for example an example msg from james knott just arrived
here with the following headers (verbatim as received):
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from openoffice.org (s006.sjc.collab.net [204.16.104.2])
by scottsonline.org.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id m6BBWLDl013228
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:32:22 +0100 (BST)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: (qmail 21931 invoked by uid 5000); 11 Jul 2008 11:32:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
list-help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
list-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Delivered-To: mailing list [email protected]
Received: (qmail 21905 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2008 11:32:08 -0000
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AocBAA3idkjOvjUcf2dsb2JhbACSKAEBCwUCBgcRTJxdAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.30,344,1212390000";
d="scan'208";a="13608354"
X-IRONPORT: SCANNED
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=s1024; d=rogers.com;
h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
b=EwRnHJiXP+/fNISc4tWhUxXdU0CtNnPrxy3CYQaIPGResLdVhkmYyd5OPV4s7P3KHNeiihOrH8YZTv3rEdicIRLAt7eBPidTC3PKrlvvqedUEvkc4YGpQRyBdHPxl608YAQlK1OcXIGhYQR19I2boUkEGr1T6zOlQRylfqyQ1/4=
;
X-YMail-OSG:
h93k5tgVM1nH4QyldiDpiFHmA1JICP_Gimwi2v96xbRZ321gu7Y4_lkUfGlRA6a4tg--
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 07:32:02 -0400
From: James Knott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: OpenOffice <[email protected]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.8.1.13)
Gecko/20080316 SUSE/1.1.9-1.1 SeaMonkey/1.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [users] Fw: [moderated]
X-Greylist: Sender DNS name whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0
(scottsonline.org.uk [86.22.68.66]); Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:32:23 +0100 (BST)
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.62 on 86.22.68.66
X-PM-PLACEHOLDER:
where I see no 'received' header from before it hit the list
exploder.
>
> Speaking of headers; you might want to have a look at
> http://www.spamhaus.org/pbl/query/PBL182680
> Your "Received: from scottsonline.org.uk ([86.22.68.66])" is the cause...
Not clear what you're getting at there - cause ..... of what exactly? I
can't see any relevance to the above?
--
Permission for this mail to be processed by any third party in connection
with marketing or advertising purposes is hereby explicitly denied.
http://www.scottsonline.org.uk lists incoming sites blocked because of spam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mike Scott, Harlow, Essex, England
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
