On 07/11/2008 11:57 PM, mike scott wrote:
> On 11 Jul 2008 at 7:48, NoOp wrote:
> ...
>> Nope, the list doesn't strip out any headers:
>> http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=users&msgNo=183129&raw=true
>> http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=users&msgNo=183112&raw=true
>> http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=users&msgNo=182770&raw=true
>> http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=users&msgNo=183081&raw=true
>> http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=users&msgNo=183031&raw=true
> 
> I see the archived mails do have full headers.
> 
> However, for example an example msg from james knott just arrived 
> here with the following headers (verbatim as received):
> 
[snip]
> 
> where I see no 'received' header from before it hit the list 
> exploder. 

Sorry, you've got me there. I use gmane to read the list so my headers
for that msg would be quite different. I don't have the gmane headers
handy as I killfile the [moderated] thread as it's gone on for years.

> 
> 
>> 
>> Speaking of headers; you might want to have a look at
>> http://www.spamhaus.org/pbl/query/PBL182680
>> Your "Received: from scottsonline.org.uk ([86.22.68.66])" is the cause...
> 
> Not clear what you're getting at there - cause ..... of what exactly?  I
> can't see any relevance to the above?
> 
> 

It has no relevance to the above, I was just pointing out that your IP
address is on the PBL and that you might want to look into getting it
fixed/resolved.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to