Hi Daniel.
I am repeating the test using 6 instances of SIPp, and I am having a better
performance.
A question. In the page you have listed that the Proxy and UAS runs on a 64
bit machine. Was the compilation done to generate a 64 bit executable?
Thanks.
Kind regards.
Sergio Gutierrez
On 3/21/07, Sergio Gutierrez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Daniel.
Thanks for your answer.
My configs are as the same used in published tests, and my UAS, as
described is another instance of Openser.
I will try what you sugest.
Thanks.
Sergio Gutiérrez.
On 3/21/07, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> do you use same configs as in published tests? The UAS is another
> openser with just sending a 200 ok reply or sipp with uas scenario?
>
> First check what is the capacity of sipp -- make a very simple config
> with just sl_send_reply("200","ok") in main route and start sipp. See
> what results you get and that should be the reference for sipp capacity.
> Also, try to use multiple instances of sipp, from different servers, see
>
> if you get the cumulative value better.
>
> The tests were done on Core2 processor, and parallel execution of
> openser processes has some impact as well.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> On 03/21/07 16:52, Sergio Gutierrez wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Currently I am installing Openser 1.2.0 on a Sun Fire T2000 running
> > Solaris 10.
> > Although I used an optimized version of GCC for SPARC Systems, and
> > used the recommended settings to generate accurate code for my
> > Processor (UltraSPARC T1), the results of the performance tests are
> > just 50% of the presented ones on the web page.
> >
> > My setup is the following:
> >
> > Proxy and UAS: Sun Fire T2000, 8 GB RAM, 1 UltraSPARC T1 1.2 GHZ 6
> Core.
> > UAC's: Two domain of a Sun Fire 12K, 4 GB RAM, 4 UlraSPARC III+ 900
> Mhz
> > Software versions listed as on the webpage.
> >
> > openser -V output:
> > version: openser 1.2.0-notls (sparc/solaris)
> > flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST,
> > SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT-NOSMP
> > ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
> > MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535
> > poll method support: poll, select, /dev/poll.
> > svnrevision: unknown
> > @(#) $Id: main.c 1827 2007-03-12 15:22:53Z bogdan_iancu $
> > main.c compiled on 21:43:51 Mar 19 2007 with gcc 4.0.3
> >
> >
> > I would thank any idea about how could I improve the performnace of my
> > setup. I think that because of the hardware specifications, the result
> > should be at least equal than listed.
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Kind regards.
> >
> > Sergio Gutiérrez.
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
