On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Gianluca Cecchi
<gianluca.cec...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Nir Soffer <nsof...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Lesson, use only storage without problems ;-)
>
>
> hopefully... ;-)
>
>>
>> >> Can you share the output of:
>> >>
>> >>     sanlock client renewal -s 900b1853-e192-4661-a0f9-7c7c396f6f49
>> >
>> >
>> > No, the storage domain has been removed
>>
>> Next time when you have storage issues, please remember to grab
>> the output of this command.
>>
>> Nir
>
>
>
>
> For example, on a currently active storage domain I get:
>
> [g.cecchi@ovmsrv05 ~]$ sudo sanlock client renewal -s
> 922b5269-ab56-4c4d-838f-49d33427e2ab
> timestamp=1207533 read_ms=2 write_ms=0 next_timeouts=0 next_errors=0
> timestamp=1207554 read_ms=2 write_ms=0 next_timeouts=0 next_errors=0
> ...
> timestamp=1211163 read_ms=2 write_ms=0 next_timeouts=0 next_errors=0
> timestamp=1211183 read_ms=2 write_ms=0 next_timeouts=0 next_errors=0
> timestamp=1211204 read_ms=2 write_ms=0 next_timeouts=0 next_errors=0
>
> How do I translate this output above? What would be the difference in case
> of problems?

David, can you explain this output?

read_ms and write_ms looks obvious, but next_timeout and next_errors are
a mystery to me.

Nir
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to