Hello Tal It seems you have a very big overkill on your environment. I would say that normally 2 x 10Gb interfaces can do A LOT for nodes with proper redundancy. Just creating Vlans you can separate traffic and apply, if necessary, QoS per Vlan to guarantee which one is more priority.
If you have 2 x 10Gb in a LACP 802.3ad Aggregation in theory you can do 20Gbps of aggregated traffic. If you have 10Gb of constant storage traffic it is already huge, so I normally consider that Storage will not go over a few Gbps and VMs another few Gb which fit perfectly within even 10Gb The only exception I would make is if you have a very intensive (and I am not talking about IOPS, but throughput) from your storage then may be worth to have 2 x 10Gb for Storage and 2 x 10Gb for all other networks (Managment, VMs Traffic, Migration(with cap on traffic), etc). Regards Fernando 2018-03-21 16:41 GMT-03:00 Yaniv Kaul <yk...@redhat.com>: > > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 12:41 PM, Tal Bar-Or <tba...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello All, >> >> I am about to deploy a new Ovirt platform, the platform will consist 4 >> Ovirt nodes including management, all servers nodes and storage will have >> the following config: >> >> *nodes server* >> 4x10G ports network cards >> 2x10G will be used for VM network. >> 2x10G will be used for storage connection >> 2x1Ge 1xGe for nodes management >> >> >> *Storage *4x10G ports network cards >> 3 x10G for NFS storage mount Ovirt nodes >> >> Now given above network configuration layout, what is best practices in >> terms of nodes for storage NFS connection, throughput and path resilience >> suggested to use >> First option each node 2x 10G lacp and on storage side 3x10G lacp? >> > > I'm not sure how you'd get more throughout than you can get in a single > physical link. You will get redundancy. > > Of course, on the storage side you might benefit from multiple bonded > interfaces. > > >> The second option creates 3 VLAN's assign each node on that 3 VLAN's >> across 2 nic, and on storage, side assigns 3 nice across 3 VLANs? >> > > Interesting - but I assume it'll still stick to a single physical link. > Y. > > Thanks >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Tal Bar-or >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> Users@ovirt.org >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users