Thanks all for your answer, it's more clear now On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 7:24 PM, FERNANDO FREDIANI < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Tal > > It seems you have a very big overkill on your environment. I would say > that normally 2 x 10Gb interfaces can do A LOT for nodes with proper > redundancy. Just creating Vlans you can separate traffic and apply, if > necessary, QoS per Vlan to guarantee which one is more priority. > > If you have 2 x 10Gb in a LACP 802.3ad Aggregation in theory you can do > 20Gbps of aggregated traffic. If you have 10Gb of constant storage traffic > it is already huge, so I normally consider that Storage will not go over a > few Gbps and VMs another few Gb which fit perfectly within even 10Gb > > The only exception I would make is if you have a very intensive (and I am > not talking about IOPS, but throughput) from your storage then may be worth > to have 2 x 10Gb for Storage and 2 x 10Gb for all other networks > (Managment, VMs Traffic, Migration(with cap on traffic), etc). > > Regards > Fernando > > 2018-03-21 16:41 GMT-03:00 Yaniv Kaul <[email protected]>: > >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 12:41 PM, Tal Bar-Or <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hello All, >>> >>> I am about to deploy a new Ovirt platform, the platform will consist 4 >>> Ovirt nodes including management, all servers nodes and storage will have >>> the following config: >>> >>> *nodes server* >>> 4x10G ports network cards >>> 2x10G will be used for VM network. >>> 2x10G will be used for storage connection >>> 2x1Ge 1xGe for nodes management >>> >>> >>> *Storage *4x10G ports network cards >>> 3 x10G for NFS storage mount Ovirt nodes >>> >>> Now given above network configuration layout, what is best practices in >>> terms of nodes for storage NFS connection, throughput and path resilience >>> suggested to use >>> First option each node 2x 10G lacp and on storage side 3x10G lacp? >>> >> >> I'm not sure how you'd get more throughout than you can get in a single >> physical link. You will get redundancy. >> >> Of course, on the storage side you might benefit from multiple bonded >> interfaces. >> >> >>> The second option creates 3 VLAN's assign each node on that 3 VLAN's >>> across 2 nic, and on storage, side assigns 3 nice across 3 VLANs? >>> >> >> Interesting - but I assume it'll still stick to a single physical link. >> Y. >> >> Thanks >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Tal Bar-or >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> > -- Tal Bar-or
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
