Maybe I did not understand well. Should I use the snapshot version before the first signature ? Or the goal of the bug fix is to manage a document that contains this kind of initial signature which is invisible ? (which was my test, so it means the bug is not fix, or I did not test it correctly or this is another use case)
Thanks Fred Le sam. 17 déc. 2022 à 05:16, Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de> a écrit : > That new PDF also has that the initial signature does not appear in the > page annotations (which was the bug fixed in the issue). > > Tilman > > On 16.12.2022 20:56, Frédéric Ravetier wrote: > > I tried to switch the jar on the environment where there is the > application > > that sign the PDF in order to use the snapshot. > > Here the pdf I got : > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zwV0i3SCQrqxRICpVWhbR09Of2FD0Ur7/view?usp=sharing > > But it looks the same in acrobat :(. > > > > Best regards, > > Fred > > > > Le ven. 16 déc. 2022 à 13:19, Frédéric Ravetier <fravet...@vikta.com> a > > écrit : > > > >> I read the issue too quickly. > >> The problem is on DSS side, and the jar file should be modified on my > >> provider side. I will see if we can perform this test on a dev > environment. > >> > >> Le ven. 16 déc. 2022 à 13:06, Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de> a > >> écrit : > >> > >>> On 16.12.2022 12:59, Frédéric Ravetier wrote: > >>>> Good idea, I can try to use the latest snapshot jar. Is there a > >>>> snapshot build (jar) available? > >>> > >>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/pdfbox/pdfbox-app/2.0.28-SNAPSHOT/ > >>> > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@pdfbox.apache.org > >>> > >>> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@pdfbox.apache.org > >
