So I tried again with a PDF without a signature. I switch the jar on the tool that sign the PDF to use the snapshot I send the pdf to the tool to have a first signature I used my java program to add an annotation I send again the pdf to the tool for a second signature
I still have the same behavior :(. This is the final PDF : https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CV7lJ8dY1gDcx3rgHoW5yHJ612JSAK9B/view?usp=share_link Le sam. 17 déc. 2022 à 12:27, Frédéric Ravetier <fravet...@vikta.com> a écrit : > OK so my test was useless. I will try again > > Le sam. 17 déc. 2022, 11:30, Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de> a > écrit : > >> On 17.12.2022 11:19, Frédéric Ravetier wrote: >> > Maybe I did not understand well. >> > >> > Should I use the snapshot version before the first signature ? >> >> You should use the snapshot to create the first signature, that's what I >> meant. >> >> My hope is that this Adobe behavior is related to that bug. >> >> No, the bug fix does not help with a document that already has that >> signature. >> >> Tilman >> >> >> > Or the goal of the bug fix is to manage a document that contains this >> kind >> > of initial signature which is invisible ? (which was my test, so it >> means >> > the bug is not fix, or I did not test it correctly or this is another >> use >> > case) >> > >> > Thanks >> > Fred >> > >> > >> > >> > Le sam. 17 déc. 2022 à 05:16, Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de> a >> > écrit : >> > >> >> That new PDF also has that the initial signature does not appear in the >> >> page annotations (which was the bug fixed in the issue). >> >> >> >> Tilman >> >> >> >> On 16.12.2022 20:56, Frédéric Ravetier wrote: >> >>> I tried to switch the jar on the environment where there is the >> >> application >> >>> that sign the PDF in order to use the snapshot. >> >>> Here the pdf I got : >> >>> >> >> >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zwV0i3SCQrqxRICpVWhbR09Of2FD0Ur7/view?usp=sharing >> >>> But it looks the same in acrobat :(. >> >>> >> >>> Best regards, >> >>> Fred >> >>> >> >>> Le ven. 16 déc. 2022 à 13:19, Frédéric Ravetier <fravet...@vikta.com> >> a >> >>> écrit : >> >>> >> >>>> I read the issue too quickly. >> >>>> The problem is on DSS side, and the jar file should be modified on my >> >>>> provider side. I will see if we can perform this test on a dev >> >> environment. >> >>>> Le ven. 16 déc. 2022 à 13:06, Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de> >> a >> >>>> écrit : >> >>>> >> >>>>> On 16.12.2022 12:59, Frédéric Ravetier wrote: >> >>>>>> Good idea, I can try to use the latest snapshot jar. Is there a >> >>>>>> snapshot build (jar) available? >> >>>>> >> >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/pdfbox/pdfbox-app/2.0.28-SNAPSHOT/ >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org >> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@pdfbox.apache.org >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@pdfbox.apache.org >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@pdfbox.apache.org >> >>
