I know that this is also true in the python qmf client (which is probably
what underlies gpid-tool.

It seems reasonable to me that if you ASK for both, that you receive
information once in each form, so long as the broker agent supports both.

Bill


On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Jakub Scholz <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I noticed that when I run my broker (0.28 RC1) with both QMF1 and QMF2
> enabled, the qpid-tool shows all of the QMF objects twice. For example the
> "list broker" command returns:
>     ID   Created   Destroyed  Index
>     =====================================================================
>     129  16:03:39  -          amqp-broker
>     130  16:03:39  -          org.apache.qpid.broker:broker:amqp-broker
>
> the "list queue" returns:
>     ID   Created   Destroyed  Index
>
>
> =================================================================================
>     149  16:03:44  -          173.qmfc-v2-hb-withe.14631.1
>     150  16:03:44  -          173.qmfc-v2-ui-withe.14631.1
>     151  16:03:44  -          173.qmfc-v2-withe.14631.1
>     152  16:03:44  -          173.reply-withe.14631.1
>     153  16:03:44  -          173.topic-withe.14631.1
>     154  16:03:44  -
>  org.apache.qpid.broker:queue:qmfc-v2-hb-withe.14631.1
>     155  16:03:44  -
>  org.apache.qpid.broker:queue:qmfc-v2-ui-withe.14631.1
>     156  16:03:44  -
>  org.apache.qpid.broker:queue:qmfc-v2-withe.14631.1
>     157  16:03:44  -
>  org.apache.qpid.broker:queue:reply-withe.14631.1
>     158  16:03:44  -
>  org.apache.qpid.broker:queue:topic-withe.14631.1
>
> Are the QMF1 and QMF2 supposed to be mutually exclusive or is this a bug in
> the qpid-tool?
>
> Regards
> Jakub
>

Reply via email to