Please raise a Jira. We can get it fixed. -Ted
On 04/28/2014 03:12 PM, Jakub Scholz wrote: > Hi Ted, > > Well, it is not critical in terms of actually breaking some functionality - > it just makes the qpid-tool even less useful than before. Although I guess > if the problem is in the Python QMF library it self (as mentioned by Bill) > it can break some custom tools based on these libraries. > > Should I enter a JIRA for it? Or do you want to keep it as it is? > > Regards > Jakub > > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Ted Ross <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Jakub, >> >> The broker object is in fact duplicated/aliased. I don't see (nor do I >> expect) any duplicates in the queue list. >> >> The aliasing of the broker object is a side-effect of the dual protocol. >> I suppose it could be considered a bug in qpid-tool but I don't think >> it's a serious one. >> >> -Ted >> >> On 04/26/2014 12:09 PM, Jakub Scholz wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I noticed that when I run my broker (0.28 RC1) with both QMF1 and QMF2 >>> enabled, the qpid-tool shows all of the QMF objects twice. For example >> the >>> "list broker" command returns: >>> ID Created Destroyed Index >>> ===================================================================== >>> 129 16:03:39 - amqp-broker >>> 130 16:03:39 - org.apache.qpid.broker:broker:amqp-broker >>> >>> the "list queue" returns: >>> ID Created Destroyed Index >>> >>> >> ================================================================================= >>> 149 16:03:44 - 173.qmfc-v2-hb-withe.14631.1 >>> 150 16:03:44 - 173.qmfc-v2-ui-withe.14631.1 >>> 151 16:03:44 - 173.qmfc-v2-withe.14631.1 >>> 152 16:03:44 - 173.reply-withe.14631.1 >>> 153 16:03:44 - 173.topic-withe.14631.1 >>> 154 16:03:44 - >>> org.apache.qpid.broker:queue:qmfc-v2-hb-withe.14631.1 >>> 155 16:03:44 - >>> org.apache.qpid.broker:queue:qmfc-v2-ui-withe.14631.1 >>> 156 16:03:44 - >>> org.apache.qpid.broker:queue:qmfc-v2-withe.14631.1 >>> 157 16:03:44 - >>> org.apache.qpid.broker:queue:reply-withe.14631.1 >>> 158 16:03:44 - >>> org.apache.qpid.broker:queue:topic-withe.14631.1 >>> >>> Are the QMF1 and QMF2 supposed to be mutually exclusive or is this a bug >> in >>> the qpid-tool? >>> >>> Regards >>> Jakub >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
