Raised as QPID-5728. Thanks & Regards Jakub
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Ted Ross <[email protected]> wrote: > Please raise a Jira. We can get it fixed. > > -Ted > > On 04/28/2014 03:12 PM, Jakub Scholz wrote: > > Hi Ted, > > > > Well, it is not critical in terms of actually breaking some > functionality - > > it just makes the qpid-tool even less useful than before. Although I > guess > > if the problem is in the Python QMF library it self (as mentioned by > Bill) > > it can break some custom tools based on these libraries. > > > > Should I enter a JIRA for it? Or do you want to keep it as it is? > > > > Regards > > Jakub > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Ted Ross <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Jakub, > >> > >> The broker object is in fact duplicated/aliased. I don't see (nor do I > >> expect) any duplicates in the queue list. > >> > >> The aliasing of the broker object is a side-effect of the dual protocol. > >> I suppose it could be considered a bug in qpid-tool but I don't think > >> it's a serious one. > >> > >> -Ted > >> > >> On 04/26/2014 12:09 PM, Jakub Scholz wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I noticed that when I run my broker (0.28 RC1) with both QMF1 and QMF2 > >>> enabled, the qpid-tool shows all of the QMF objects twice. For example > >> the > >>> "list broker" command returns: > >>> ID Created Destroyed Index > >>> > ===================================================================== > >>> 129 16:03:39 - amqp-broker > >>> 130 16:03:39 - org.apache.qpid.broker:broker:amqp-broker > >>> > >>> the "list queue" returns: > >>> ID Created Destroyed Index > >>> > >>> > >> > ================================================================================= > >>> 149 16:03:44 - 173.qmfc-v2-hb-withe.14631.1 > >>> 150 16:03:44 - 173.qmfc-v2-ui-withe.14631.1 > >>> 151 16:03:44 - 173.qmfc-v2-withe.14631.1 > >>> 152 16:03:44 - 173.reply-withe.14631.1 > >>> 153 16:03:44 - 173.topic-withe.14631.1 > >>> 154 16:03:44 - > >>> org.apache.qpid.broker:queue:qmfc-v2-hb-withe.14631.1 > >>> 155 16:03:44 - > >>> org.apache.qpid.broker:queue:qmfc-v2-ui-withe.14631.1 > >>> 156 16:03:44 - > >>> org.apache.qpid.broker:queue:qmfc-v2-withe.14631.1 > >>> 157 16:03:44 - > >>> org.apache.qpid.broker:queue:reply-withe.14631.1 > >>> 158 16:03:44 - > >>> org.apache.qpid.broker:queue:topic-withe.14631.1 > >>> > >>> Are the QMF1 and QMF2 supposed to be mutually exclusive or is this a > bug > >> in > >>> the qpid-tool? > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> Jakub > >>> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
