On 2 March 2015 at 19:30, Gordon Sim <g...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 02/24/2015 08:48 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote: >> >> In a short while when people have had enough time to absorb the proposal >> and comment I will post a code review of the actual code changes. As >> there are substantial API changes I'd like to get this in for 0.9 >> because we were intending to stabilise the API at this point. > > > To me it seems a bit late in the cycle for 0.9 for changes of this magnitude > and I'd prefer to see it included during 0.10 with any accompanying changes > to ssl.
I've been starting to think that way too. Shipping 0.9 now without the major SASL changes, then turning 0.10 around much more quickly with those and anything else finished in a similar timeframe seems like a nicer prospect to me. Its already > 2 months behind schedule afterall and there are dependent releases (0.32) already long underway. Robbie --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
