I agree the message translation failure is a significant issue... and really we should push out a fix for it as soon as we can. It probably does therefore make sense to spin another RC, take care of this issue and the other ones that Gordon raised, and any other small tidy-ups/enhancements.
Let's cancel this vote, respin an RC4 and start again then... hopefully this'll be the last one though :-) -- Rob On 18 May 2016 at 13:57, Oleksandr Rudyy <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > I believe that it would be better to release 6.0.3 with fixes in > QPID-6096, QPID-7268, QPID-72689. > > Additionally, I would like to suggest an inclusion of QPID-7255 ( > Support delivery delay). It seems that finishing and releasing of 6.1 > will take some time and having a released version with this feature > would be beneficial for many users. > > Kind Regards, > Alex > > On 18 May 2016 at 13:46, Lorenz Quack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > On 16/05/16 22:55, Rob Godfrey wrote: > >> > >> On 16 May 2016 at 18:27, Gordon Sim <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> On 16/05/16 18:23, Rob Godfrey wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 16 May 2016 at 18:21, Gordon Sim <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> One further point to mention, a message sent over 0-10 to a queue > could > >>>>> not be received over 1.0 - the transfer frame appears to have no > >>>>> payload. > >>>>> Not sure if this expected to work or not and not a blocker. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> It *should* work. I'm doubtful this has changed since 6.0.2 so it > >>>> > >>>> wouldn't > >>>> be a blocker for me... can you raise a JIRA? > >>>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7268 > >>> > >>> > >> OK - I think this is now fixed on trunk. Given it has been broken for a > >> while, I don't think it's a blocker for 6.0.3, but I'd suggest we > schedule > >> it for the next 6.0.x release if we have one. > >> > >> -- Rob > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I would like to politely disagree. I think this is serious enough (even > > tough it is not a regression) to warrant a respin. > > As pointed out in a separate email on this list by Alex Szczuczko AMQP > > version interoperability is one of the advertising points of Qpid so > IMHO if > > we are aware of an issue in this space we should fix it ASAP. > > > > Therefore, from me a -1 > > > > > > Kind Regards, > > Lorenz > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
