The vote is canceled. A new RC will be spin to address the issues pointed out by Lorenz and Rob.
Kind Regards, Alex On 18 May 2016 at 14:00, Rob Godfrey <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree the message translation failure is a significant issue... and > really we should push out a fix for it as soon as we can. It probably does > therefore make sense to spin another RC, take care of this issue and the > other ones that Gordon raised, and any other small tidy-ups/enhancements. > > Let's cancel this vote, respin an RC4 and start again then... hopefully > this'll be the last one though :-) > > -- Rob > > On 18 May 2016 at 13:57, Oleksandr Rudyy <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> I believe that it would be better to release 6.0.3 with fixes in >> QPID-6096, QPID-7268, QPID-72689. >> >> Additionally, I would like to suggest an inclusion of QPID-7255 ( >> Support delivery delay). It seems that finishing and releasing of 6.1 >> will take some time and having a released version with this feature >> would be beneficial for many users. >> >> Kind Regards, >> Alex >> >> On 18 May 2016 at 13:46, Lorenz Quack <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On 16/05/16 22:55, Rob Godfrey wrote: >> >> >> >> On 16 May 2016 at 18:27, Gordon Sim <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On 16/05/16 18:23, Rob Godfrey wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> On 16 May 2016 at 18:21, Gordon Sim <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> One further point to mention, a message sent over 0-10 to a queue >> could >> >>>>> not be received over 1.0 - the transfer frame appears to have no >> >>>>> payload. >> >>>>> Not sure if this expected to work or not and not a blocker. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> It *should* work. I'm doubtful this has changed since 6.0.2 so it >> >>>> >> >>>> wouldn't >> >>>> be a blocker for me... can you raise a JIRA? >> >>>> >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7268 >> >>> >> >>> >> >> OK - I think this is now fixed on trunk. Given it has been broken for a >> >> while, I don't think it's a blocker for 6.0.3, but I'd suggest we >> schedule >> >> it for the next 6.0.x release if we have one. >> >> >> >> -- Rob >> > >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > I would like to politely disagree. I think this is serious enough (even >> > tough it is not a regression) to warrant a respin. >> > As pointed out in a separate email on this list by Alex Szczuczko AMQP >> > version interoperability is one of the advertising points of Qpid so >> IMHO if >> > we are aware of an issue in this space we should fix it ASAP. >> > >> > Therefore, from me a -1 >> > >> > >> > Kind Regards, >> > Lorenz >> > >> > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
