On Fri, 2017-01-06 at 19:28 +0000, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > On 18 December 2016 at 23:17, Robbie Gemmell <[email protected] > m> wrote: > > On 16 December 2016 at 18:11, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemmell@gmail. > > com> wrote: > > > On 15 December 2016 at 18:05, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemmell@gmai > > > l.com> wrote: > > > > On 23 November 2016 at 12:40, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemmell@gm > > > > ail.com> wrote: > > > > > I'd like to call this out more specifically following > > > > > discussion in a > > > > > couple of recent threads, to ensure folks are clear on things > > > > > before > > > > > they proceed. If not, shout. > > > > > > > > > > Following completion of the 0.16.0 release, I will look to > > > > > proceed > > > > > with making proton-j and proton-c (+bindings) more > > > > > independent to > > > > > allow them to each be released individually and more easily > > > > > differ > > > > > where appropriate in order to best serve users needs. As part > > > > > of this > > > > > I will look to: > > > > > > > > > > - Have infra create a separate repository for proton-j, > > > > > likely "qpid-proton-j". > > > > > - Remove Messenger from proton-j. > > > > > > > > > > On the former, I think just cloning the existing repo and > > > > > trimming > > > > > things to leave the bits of interest is probably the easiest > > > > > way to > > > > > go, with a reverse trim happening for the existing > > > > > repository. Any > > > > > other thoughts on that? > > > > > > > > > > On the latter, I still need to look at the overall impact, > > > > > since some > > > > > of the python tests do use Messenger and I believe not always > > > > > to test > > > > > Messenger-specific things. If there are tests using messenger > > > > > that are > > > > > of obvious interest which can't quickly be replaced, then I > > > > > would move > > > > > the messenger impl to just being part of the tests to at the > > > > > very > > > > > least remove it from the main component until they can be > > > > > replaced. > > > > > I'd look to keep as many of the non-messenger tests as we can > > > > > initially, replacing them over time where appropriate. > > > > > > > > > > We should start by marking proton-j messenger as deprecated > > > > > in 0.16.0, > > > > > I will do that shortly. The rest will begin after 0.16.0 is > > > > > complete. > > > > > > > > > > Robbie > > > > > > > > As an update on this, I raised > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13080 earlier in > > > > the week, > > > > and we now have a new repo in place for proton-j, > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=qpid-proton-j.git > > > > > > > > The GitHub mirror should go live during the next 24hrs, theres > > > > a daily > > > > sync point for the process. > > > > > > > > > The GitHub mirror is now also in place: > > > https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton-j > > > > > > I didn't get a chance to start scrubbing things yet, but I may > > > get > > > bored during my holidays...which start right about now :) > > > > > > Robbie > > > > I decided not to leave this hanging entirely until the new year and > > so > > made an initial stab at carving proton-j out on its own and then > > removing Messenger. It still needs more cleanup before I land it in > > the new year but it is well on the way, current state is viewable > > at > > https://github.com/gemmellr/qpid-proton-j/tree/independent-proton-j > > for anyone wanting to check it out before that. I haven't looked at > > the reverse case of removing proton-j from the original repo, I > > will > > leave that until after the holidays are over. > > > > Robbie > > I've been working on the reverse case of removing proton-j from the > original qpid-proton repo now that its new repo has been created. > > The current state is viewable on this branch: > https://github.com/gemmellr/qpid-proton/tree/independent-proton-c > > Or as a diff from the current master, look at > https://github.com/gemmellr/qpid-proton/compare/master...gemmellr:ind > ependent-proton-c > > I think this side of things is about ready to go, I plan to land it > on > master next week.
>From the pov of changes to the proton-c build system this looks right - and if not then I'm sure the fixes will be small. Andrew --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
