Hello, I am wondering if all those who casted the votes or will do so have tested the different proactor implementations? >From the voting replies this is not clear.
In my case, I am being defaulted to the epoll as I haven't installed libuv yet. Regards, Adel ________________________________ From: Andrew Stitcher <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 11:31:07 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Qpid Proton 0.18.0 Some more problems found on FreeBSD and building with a libuv proactor on Linux: PROTON-1642, PROTON-1643, PROTON-1644, PROTON-1645 Everything I've found today is all either on uncommon platforms (RPi, FreeBSD) or using the less tested libuv proactor. So despite finding these, it's actually not clear to me whether they are really important enough to nix the release. What do others think? For the moment I think I'm going to abstain. Andrew On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 18:29 +0100, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > Hi folks, > > I have put together a first spin for a Qpid Proton 0.18.0 release, > please test it and vote accordingly. > > The source archive can be grabbed from: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.18.0-rc1/ > > The JIRAs currently assigned are: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=1231 > 3720&version=12338903 > > It is tagged as 0.18.0-rc1. > > Regards, > Robbie > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
