I'll fix the libuv proactor stuff but I'm not convinced that's a show stopper. I'd be inclined to include it in a respin if there is one when its ready but not hold up the release.
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:31 PM, Andrew Stitcher <[email protected]> wrote: > Some more problems found on FreeBSD and building with a libuv proactor > on Linux: > > PROTON-1642, PROTON-1643, PROTON-1644, PROTON-1645 > > Everything I've found today is all either on uncommon platforms (RPi, > FreeBSD) or using the less tested libuv proactor. > > So despite finding these, it's actually not clear to me whether they > are really important enough to nix the release. > > What do others think? For the moment I think I'm going to abstain. > > Andrew > > On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 18:29 +0100, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > I have put together a first spin for a Qpid Proton 0.18.0 release, > > please test it and vote accordingly. > > > > The source archive can be grabbed from: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.18.0-rc1/ > > > > The JIRAs currently assigned are: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=1231 > > 3720&version=12338903 > > > > It is tagged as 0.18.0-rc1. > > > > Regards, > > Robbie > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
