Hi Aurelién, I'm currently running some experiments in a nucleo-L073RZ, calling xtimer_usleep with small random values, just to check if I can reproduce the issue. On the other side, is the same issue happening if you increase the XTIMER_BACKOFF?
Cheers, José Le lun. 15 janv. 2018 à 21:59, Aurélien Fillau <[email protected]> a écrit : > Hi, > > Thank you for your replies and i apologize for the delay in responding. > We are working on custom boards now that embeds a STM32L073CZT6 CPU. We > have started the project with a nucleo-l073rz board (STM32L073RZT6), and i > think it can be easily reproduced on this board. > xtimer_usleep() is called from thread context (not from an isr context). > I didn't try to change XTIMER_BACKOFF because i have stabilized it to > faced another issue (Indeed, xtimer_usleep() was sleeping my task forever > if XTIMER_BACKOFF was too small). > This "blocking while" can occur at startup or after 24 hours or even after > a longer period of time, or even never on some boards, that's why it is not > easily reproducible. > > Regards, > > Aurélien > > Le 15 janv. 2018 10:56, "Jose Alamos" <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> Hi Aurélien: >> >> Could you give us more information about your platform? (e.g CPU model, >> etc). >> Are you getting the same results with different values of XTIMER_BACKOFF? >> >> Cheers >> >> José >> >> _______________________________________________ >> users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> >>
_______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/users
