Hi Alex,
for jewel, for example you can see TodoMVC, when I added MXRoyale to get
SharedObject visuals changed
I need to add to the pom.xml this:
-compiler.exclude-defaults-css-files=MXRoyale-${royale.framework.version}-js.swc:defaults.css
If you remove that line, you can see the issue
Anyway, I think the problem for me is not mix UI sets, since each one
brings its defaults to commons things. For example application-body,
view,...and then containers and controls. So does not have sense to me mix
UI sets. Or said in other way: has more sense to me to provide the missing
control or container to the UI set that does not have it than mix two sets.
The other benefit for the user is while coding: code intelligence will show
just 1 button, 1 list,...and not lots of them that will never use.
Other benefit will be that compiling should have lower requirements and be
more quick since will just involve 1 UI Set library instead of lots of them.
For non-visual code libraries (Router, Network, Reflection, Binding,...)
this does not apply, since you just get the code if you use it. But UI sets
are different since each one brings different versions of the seam need and
brings common CSS to the mix too, what is never wanted (or neither, user or
compiler should have to worry about it, and should be a non-valid scenario
for us).
El lun., 10 feb. 2020 a las 8:16, Greg Dove (<[email protected]>)
escribió:
>
> "I will try to make the full source of what I have available for Cairngorm
> port in about 24 hours time from this email. I need to check all the
> licence stuff. "
>
> Sorry, I did not get to the above yet as I had hoped, but I will find time
> tomorrow local time. It turns out that I might need to use this myself for
> a client.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 7:30 PM Greg Dove <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> There is a css clash between Jewel and MXRoyale, and there might be more
>> issues at the child element level with different required base classes etc,
>> but I am not sure because I did not try that. Alex will undoubtedly explain
>> better than me.
>> I am pretty sure you cannot use MXRoyale visual components combined with
>> Jewel in the same project. But you do need the service related classes from
>> MXRoyale for Cairngorm.
>>
>> I am testing Cairngorm using 'Express', but if you want to use Jewel
>> (e.g. always <j:Button or <j:SomethingElse and never <mx:Something), the
>> following should work so that you can still use the service classes from MX
>> (which Cairngorm has hard dependencies for).
>>
>> Below is what I am doing... you need to add the third option of the
>> following in maven:
>> <additionalCompilerOptions>
>> -js-default-initializers=true;
>> -source-map=true;
>>
>> -compiler.exclude-defaults-css-files=MXRoyale-0.9.7-SNAPSHOT-js.swc:defaults.css;
>> </additionalCompilerOptions>
>>
>> The first 2 above are options I use during development - you may or may
>> not want those.
>>
>> I will try to make the full source of what I have available for Cairngorm
>> port in about 24 hours time from this email. I need to check all the
>> licence stuff. I have a test app working but no view-related Cairngorm
>> stuff yet.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 12:33 PM De Carli Gustavo <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi .
>>>
>>> *Alex* : 0.9.7-snapshot royale-compiler - you're right, this was
>>> correct, the error does not reproduce anymore (null0).
>>> *Greg*. I tried the library and it worked correctly, I would like to
>>> know the implementation of the ServiceLocator.as how it is done, I made my
>>> own and although it worked, I have problems when I add a jewel tag in the
>>> project, for example a <j: Button>
>>>
>>> Is it possible or correct to have tag mx and jewel in the same project?
>>>
>>> *thanks to you .*
>>>
>>>
>>> El vie., 7 feb. 2020 a las 14:14, Alex Harui (<[email protected]>)
>>> escribió:
>>>
>>>> Make sure your app is using the updated compiler. I assume you are
>>>> using Maven to compile the app? Check the pom.xml to make sure it is
>>>> referencing the 0.9.7-SNAPSHOT and not just 0.9.7 or some other version.
>>>> One trick is to add some System.out.println to the file that was changed
>>>> and see if it shows up in the output.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regarding the tests, in the pom.xml for some of the projects like
>>>> compiler-jx, the maven-surefire-plugin and maven-failsafe-plugin dictate
>>>> which tests/files are run.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> HTH,
>>>>
>>>> -Alex
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From: *De Carli Gustavo <[email protected]>
>>>> *Reply-To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>>> *Date: *Friday, February 7, 2020 at 3:15 AM
>>>> *To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>>> *Subject: *Re: Cairngorm problem add remote object MXML.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi, yesterday I tried with the change of Alex, from the royale-compiler
>>>> without success, the "null0" continues. I don't know if I missed a step.
>>>>
>>>> I rebuilt with the royale-compiler project "mvn clean install" and
>>>> tried again the compilation of my project.
>>>>
>>>> On the other hand I am seeing to create a Test in the project, but I
>>>> see that they are not running the tests of the package "royale-compiler \
>>>> compiler-jx \ src \ test \ java \ org \ apache \ royale \ compiler \
>>>> internal \ codegen \ mxml \ ...", do you know why?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Gustavo.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> El vie., 7 feb. 2020 a las 4:21, Greg Dove (<[email protected]>)
>>>> escribió:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'll try to get an minimal example working over my weekend sometime to
>>>> test what I have. I made a quick start on that, just to get something that
>>>> compiles. Once I see that it seems to be working I will release to git repo
>>>> for the port.
>>>>
>>>> If you do want to try a different swc from what you already have, you
>>>> could try one now from builds here I think:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://www.dropbox.com/sh/xk8aui9ghy30mid/AAAAx0LUpfjXEQWC221zAjTza?dl=0
>>>> <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dropbox.com%2Fsh%2Fxk8aui9ghy30mid%2FAAAAx0LUpfjXEQWC221zAjTza%3Fdl%3D0&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C707a97326caa408ce15e08d7abbf0ebb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637166709390899554&sdata=6YfYnU896lHruaduCxUnrCkndhecXz7JELyQBoJd%2FFU%3D&reserved=0>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> (I will remove that link in some days once the port is more thoroughly
>>>> tested and available to all)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I was able to inspect and verify that the js build had a
>>>> ServicesLocator (as defined in that swc) mxml subclass which was populating
>>>> correctly with the recent compiler changes from Alex, but I am not yet able
>>>> to test more thoroughly. The view support probably won't work yet because
>>>> there are no 'added' and 'removed' events, but we will figure something
>>>> out.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 6:23 PM Greg Dove <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Alex, I tested this change today. There is more to it than that, it
>>>> seems. I will discuss details in dev list.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 8:40 AM Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> royale-compiler
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From: *De Carli Gustavo <[email protected]>
>>>> *Reply-To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>>> *Date: *Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 11:39 AM
>>>> *To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>>> *Subject: *Re: Cairngorm problem add remote object MXML.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sorry Alex, what repository is that of the push ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> El jue., 6 feb. 2020 a las 16:13, Alex Harui (<[email protected]>)
>>>> escribió:
>>>>
>>>> I just pushed a change to the compiler. It should now have valid
>>>> output for ServiceLocator.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The compiler change was interesting in that I changed an else clause
>>>> that was put in to handle instances specified as children of top tags but
>>>> was doing the wrong thing. All of the compiler tests passed, but never hit
>>>> that code so none of our tests actually used that code, even though the
>>>> commit log implied it was for one of the tests. Either I made the earlier
>>>> change to propagate the fix for plain properties to instances or there is
>>>> some other scenario for instances as children (without a default property)
>>>> that I am not thinking of.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Alex
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From: *De Carli Gustavo <[email protected]>
>>>> *Reply-To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>>> *Date: *Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 6:03 AM
>>>> *To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>>> *Subject: *Re: Cairngorm problem add remote object MXML.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Exactly, cairmgorm, as Carlos says, is not the best option, but we save
>>>> a lot of time in migrations where they use it and leave more time for other
>>>> questions.
>>>>
>>>> i will continue to test how to fill that array today.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you very much for everyone in this collaboration.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Gustavo.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> El jue., 6 feb. 2020 a las 8:39, Carlos Rovira (<
>>>> [email protected]>) escribió:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Greg, for the sponsor credits, and thanks Takeshita for the
>>>> words :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I know Cairngorm could be good for people wanting to migrate with the
>>>> less effort possible. Anyway, I recommend, if possible to try to switch to
>>>> Crux. We already did that several years ago in Flex, since all DI, IOC
>>>> stuff, make us be more efficient and increase options. For people creating
>>>> new apps, for me there's no doubt, for people migrating, should contemplate
>>>> the Crux option if they continue evolving the app with new features...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> just my 2 :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Carlos
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> El jue., 6 feb. 2020 a las 5:28, Takeshita Shoichiro (<
>>>> [email protected]>) escribió:
>>>>
>>>> Greg, thanks for your clarification. Anyway, it is a great work.
>>>> Carlos, thanks all the times.^_^
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2020年2月6日(木) 13:22 Greg Dove <[email protected]>:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Takeshita,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes I think a few people have asked for Cairngorm or expressed interest
>>>> in it. Given the choice, I personally think Crux will be a more
>>>> modern/better option, but like I said, more people are asking for Cairngorm
>>>> now, so probably it makes sense to port that too.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm also pleased to hear that you are using Crux, I hope it's working
>>>> well for you. Please report any issues if you see them.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> One small thing: I definitely understand that you were referring to the
>>>> work I did on porting it to Royale, but just for the sake of anyone else
>>>> who reads this: it's definitely not 'my Crux framework'. The code is ported
>>>> from Swiz, and credit for the awesome features it has rests with the
>>>> original authors of Swiz (I was in contact with the original developer
>>>> during my efforts to port it to Royale).
>>>>
>>>> Also, just so people are aware, Carlos sponsored the majority of my
>>>> work on porting that, so you really have Carlos to thank for that.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Greg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 5:04 PM Takeshita Shoichiro <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Greg,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your work. We already have your Crux framework replacing
>>>> Cairngorm, it is great if Cairngorm works with Royale. It will save a
>>>> plenty of time of emulation work.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2020年2月6日(木) 12:33 Greg Dove <[email protected]>:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> There does not appear to be a default property, like an array to put
>>>> the 'children' in. I think it just creates the children as instances and
>>>> makes sure they have id properties on the mxml-generated subclass that the
>>>> instances are assigned to.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The services are then identified and categorised by iterating the
>>>> accessors of the ServiceLocator subclass via reflection and checking their
>>>> types and then registering them.
>>>>
>>>> Although it is and mxml instance of ServiceLocator, it is also an
>>>> enforced singleton which is accessed elsewhere from code. At least that is
>>>> how it appears to be set up to me.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I already took a look at the code and have made (not many) local
>>>> changes and have the Cairngorm swc compiling via maven for both js and swf.
>>>> I have not tested it. Things like weak event listeners are gone.
>>>>
>>>> The main issue I think will be the Event.ADDED and Event.REMOVED for
>>>> ViewHelper automated register/unregister. Maybe we can have a
>>>> CaingormViewBase class with support for these, or perhaps we can use the
>>>> ADDED/REMOVED_FROM_STAGE emulation support that Crux uses, and that might
>>>> be all that is needed, but it may not always work the same.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'll try to tidy it up and share it tomorrow. The licence is BSD and is
>>>> permissive (
>>>> https://sourceforge.net/adobe/cairngorm/code/HEAD/tree/cairngorm/trunk/frameworks/cairngorm/License.txt
>>>> <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsourceforge.net%2Fadobe%2Fcairngorm%2Fcode%2FHEAD%2Ftree%2Fcairngorm%2Ftrunk%2Fframeworks%2Fcairngorm%2FLicense.txt&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C707a97326caa408ce15e08d7abbf0ebb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637166709390899554&sdata=bgcBkFJNdbJ3J%2BqiPmrcNDOPSDrM%2Bl45ekrJY%2BG%2Blm4%3D&reserved=0>)
>>>> -
>>>> It seems to be to be similar to others like MIT etc, but I don't know
>>>> specifically what the rules are for Apache with that licence (in terms of
>>>> possibility to include in Royale itself).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 3:40 PM De Carli Gustavo <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Alex :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> In flex use the swc. I am seeing the same thing that you are
>>>> commenting, I do not understand where it assigns the remote objects to the
>>>> ServiceLocator. This would have to be added to the "services" attribute of
>>>> the RemoteObjects class. I will try to assign by code without using the
>>>> mxml to see if it does not generate the error "null0".
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> El mié., 5 feb. 2020 a las 23:15, Alex Harui (<[email protected]>)
>>>> escribió:
>>>>
>>>> I grabbed ServiceLocator.as and was able to produce the null0 problem,
>>>> but the cause is that ServiceLocator does not have a default property. Did
>>>> your MXML work in Flex? What ServiceLocator property would be assigned the
>>>> mx:RemoteObject?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Alex
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From: *De Carli Gustavo <[email protected]>
>>>> *Reply-To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>>> *Date: *Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at 12:00 PM
>>>> *To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>>> *Subject: *Re: Cairngorm problem add remote object MXML.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I download https://sourceforge.net/adobe/cairngorm/code/
>>>> <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsourceforge.net%2Fadobe%2Fcairngorm%2Fcode%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C707a97326caa408ce15e08d7abbf0ebb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637166709390909515&sdata=Gc4%2FtARZq7gGGanmKlHKBRfGGAoA7BCvlhQYI5CcnMs%3D&reserved=0>,
>>>> and change.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> import flash.utils.describeType;
>>>>
>>>> --> import org.apache.royale.reflection.describeType;
>>>>
>>>> import flash.utils.Dictionary;
>>>>
>>>> --> import org.apache.royale.utils.ObjectMap;
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And this method
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> /**
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> * Return all the accessors on this object.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> * @param serviceLocator the IServiceLocator instance.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> * @return this object's accessors.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> */
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> protected
>>>>
>>>> function getAccessors(
>>>>
>>>> serviceLocator : IServiceLocator ) :
>>>>
>>>> XMLList
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> {
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> /*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> var description : XML = describeType( serviceLocator );
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> var accessors : XMLList = description.accessor.( @access == "readwrite"
>>>> ).@name;
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> return accessors;
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> */
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> return describeType( serviceLocator).accessors(@access ==
>>>>
>>>> "readwrite" ).@name;
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> El mié., 5 feb. 2020 a las 16:04, Alex Harui (<[email protected]>)
>>>> escribió:
>>>>
>>>> Carlos, What Flash APIs is Cairngorm dependent on?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Alex
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From: *Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>
>>>> *Reply-To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>>> *Date: *Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at 10:05 AM
>>>> *To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>>> *Subject: *Re: Cairngorm problem add remote object MXML.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cairngorm depends on Flash APIs, so make a Royale migration could be
>>>> not easy, or requires some expertise.
>>>>
>>>> You can use Crux instead that has support for Cairngorm style Commands.
>>>> Crux is the same as Swiz Framework for Flex but rewritten to work in
>>>> Royale, and supports much more like dependency injection, Inversion of
>>>> control, event handling, ...
>>>>
>>>> You have 3 examples in the examples/crux folder you can check.
>>>>
>>>> I recommend you Crux over Cairngorm since Swiz was born to substitute
>>>> Cairngorm
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> El mié., 5 feb. 2020 a las 18:24, De Carli Gustavo (<
>>>> [email protected]>) escribió:
>>>>
>>>> Alex
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <version>0.9.7-SNAPSHOT</version>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> El mié., 5 feb. 2020 a las 14:02, Alex Harui (<[email protected]>)
>>>> escribió:
>>>>
>>>> What version of the compiler are you using?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What does the ServiceLocator source look like? It might be an issue
>>>> with defaultProperties for non-DOM objects.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Alex
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From: *De Carli Gustavo <[email protected]>
>>>> *Reply-To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>>> *Date: *Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at 7:35 AM
>>>> *To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>>> *Subject: *Cairngorm problem add remote object MXML.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am trying to transcribe gairngorm, at runtime it gives me an error in
>>>> the construction of the ServiceLocator, I understand that it is an error of
>>>> the MXMLDataInterpreter. Anyone have any idea of the problem.
>>>>
>>>> Thank
>>>>
>>>> Gustavo.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *1. CODE *
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <cairngorm:ServiceLocator
>>>>
>>>> xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009
>>>> <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fns.adobe.com%2Fmxml%2F2009&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C707a97326caa408ce15e08d7abbf0ebb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637166709390909515&sdata=Tk8Pj%2F2DIb2xkXZ0mVPc5n4ZB6k%2FzSR2QERtGHMtnRQ%3D&reserved=0>
>>>> "
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> xmlns:mx="library://ns.apache.org/royale/mx
>>>> <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fns.apache.org%2Froyale%2Fmx&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C707a97326caa408ce15e08d7abbf0ebb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637166709390919472&sdata=b28A5VvEoq7nU%2F4YvSXE6Lk2PTjKIDEehzOoNPSmj%2Fk%3D&reserved=0>
>>>> "
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> xmlns:cairngorm="com.adobe.cairngorm.business.*">
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <mx:RemoteObject
>>>>
>>>> id="srvSeguridades"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> destination="seguridades"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> result="event.token.resultHandler(event)"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> fault="event.token.faultHandler(event)"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> endpoint="http://localhost:8080/messagebroker/amf"/>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> </cairngorm:ServiceLocator>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *2. LINE OF ERROR (RED)*
>>>>
>>>> /
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> **
>>>> * @constructor
>>>> * @extends {com.adobe.cairngorm.business.ServiceLocator}
>>>> */
>>>> services.Servicio = function() {
>>>> services.Servicio.base(this, 'constructor');
>>>>
>>>> /**
>>>> * @private
>>>> * @type {mx.rpc.remoting.mxml.RemoteObject}
>>>> */
>>>> this.srvSeguridades_;
>>>>
>>>> /**
>>>> * @private
>>>> * @type {Array}
>>>> */
>>>> this.mxmldd;
>>>>
>>>> /**
>>>> * @private
>>>> * @type {Array}
>>>> */
>>>> this.mxmldp;
>>>>
>>>> this.generateMXMLAttributes
>>>> ([1,
>>>> mx.rpc.remoting.mxml.RemoteObject,
>>>> 3,
>>>> 'id',
>>>> true,
>>>> 'srvSeguridades',
>>>> 'destination',
>>>> true,
>>>> 'seguridades',
>>>> 'endpoint',
>>>> true,
>>>> 'http://localhost:8080/messagebroker/amf',
>>>> 0,
>>>> 2,
>>>> 'result',
>>>> this.$EH0,
>>>> 'fault',
>>>> this.$EH1,
>>>> null0, <- ERROR
>>>> 0
>>>> ]);
>>>>
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 3. Trace console log
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Servicio.js:61 Uncaught ReferenceError: null0 is not defined
>>>> at new services.Servicio (Servicio.js:61)
>>>> at
>>>> Function.org.apache.royale.utils.MXMLDataInterpreter.generateMXMLArray
>>>> (MXMLDataInterpreter.js:126)
>>>> at
>>>> Function.org.apache.royale.utils.MXMLDataInterpreter.generateMXMLInstances
>>>> (MXMLDataInterpreter.js:271)
>>>> at main.Main.mx.core.UIComponent.createChildren (UIComponent.js:923)
>>>> at main.Main.mx.core.Container.createChildren (Container.js:136)
>>>> at main.Main.mx.core.Application.createChildren (Application.js:122)
>>>> at main.Main.mx.core.UIComponent.initialize (UIComponent.js:871)
>>>> at main.Main.mx.core.UIComponent.addedToParent (UIComponent.js:417)
>>>> at main.Main.mx.core.Container.addedToParent (Container.js:123)
>>>> at
>>>> Main_mx_managers_SystemManager.org.apache.royale.core.UIBase.addElement
>>>> (UIBase.js:402)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Carlos Rovira
>>>>
>>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>>>> <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C707a97326caa408ce15e08d7abbf0ebb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637166709390919472&sdata=fJXMZ6bipo5Lb9NGlxNZ5kCL89t5xVomfwABNLngzMs%3D&reserved=0>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Shoichiro Takeshita
>>>> 武下 祥一郎
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Shoichiro Takeshita
>>>> 武下 祥一郎
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Carlos Rovira
>>>>
>>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>>>> <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C707a97326caa408ce15e08d7abbf0ebb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637166709390929426&sdata=uj3muDWmQFOheOtB05JV2M%2FG3l5NuevazrXlP38S%2B1w%3D&reserved=0>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
