You should use in my opinion Nightly build of Royale 0.9.8 - JS version - Carlos should provide you compiler options which builds his project In case if you have problems with Moonshine try Nightly build of it. It is available on Moonshine's website by clicking small arrow near Download button.
wt., 9 lut 2021 o 11:34 David Slotemaker de Bruine < [email protected]> napisał(a): > A Nightly build of moonshine or Royal? How do I go about setting that up > automatically like you mentioned before. > > Cheers, > > David > > On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 at 11:16, Piotr Zarzycki <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I don't think you need that version. I think you should use JS version >> with some compiler options for your project. I would leave Carlos >> clarification. >> >> If you think that you will have problem with Moonshine try Nightly build >> of it to see if it's the same. >> >> wt., 9 lut 2021 o 11:00 David Slotemaker de Bruine < >> [email protected]> napisał(a): >> >>> No, I have download the SWF and JS Version as Carlos says I need the >>> mx:RemoteObject implementation to call BlazeDS Remote objects correctly. >>> >>> All sorts of weird things are happening now with the IDE, I get build >>> errors and mark-up warnings on all my projects even if I go back to the >>> standard JS only version of 9.8. frustrating :( Nothing compiles now. Not >>> even starting an Empty App! >>> >>> D >>> >>> On 2021/02/09 09:40:28, Piotr Zarzycki <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > Just o be clear - you are using JS only version of SDK ? Did you >>> download >>> > it trough Moonshine SDK Installer ? >>> > >>> > wt., 9 lut 2021 o 10:32 David Slotemaker de Bruine < >>> > [email protected]> napisał(a): >>> > >>> > > I am re copying the SDK, just in case a file is missing, because even >>> > > creating a empty js app is giving me compile errors. >>> > > >>> > > D >>> > > >>> > > On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 at 10:29, Piotr Zarzycki < >>> [email protected]> >>> > > wrote: >>> > > >>> > >> Carlos, >>> > >> >>> > >> Could you provide compiler options which you have in your project ? >>> I >>> > >> think David is missing something in his. I don't follow fully this >>> thread. >>> > >> >>> > >> Thanks, >>> > >> Piotr >>> > >> >>> > >> wt., 9 lut 2021 o 10:11 David Slotemaker de Bruine < >>> > >> [email protected]> napisał(a): >>> > >> >>> > >>> Yes I have "JS" selected as Run, I even selected SWF saved, and >>> > >>> reselected JS. No joy. I can clean the project but it doesn't fix >>> the >>> > >>> problem. >>> > >>> >>> > >>> Do I need the playerglobal.swc? Where can I get the .swc and where >>> do I >>> > >>> put it so I can compile? >>> > >>> >>> > >>> David >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 at 09:57, Piotr Zarzycki < >>> [email protected]> >>> > >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >>> > >>>> Hi David, >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> This is weird. Could you check in project Settings - section >>> “Run” that >>> > >>>> you have selected Platform - “JS” >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> Piotr >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 at 08:57, David Slotemaker de Bruine < >>> > >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>>> Hi Carlos, Thanks, >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> I have download the SWF and JS verison of .98 and changed the >>> paths in >>> > >>>>> Moonshine. >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> Moonshine is giving me "Definition cannot be found" source >>> errors for >>> > >>>>> the mx imports and on building >>> > >>>>> I am getting: >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> This SDK does not contains playerglobal.swc in >>> > >>>>> frameworks\libs\player\11.7\playerglobal.swc. >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> The download think has been removed by Adobe. Where can I get >>> the .swc >>> > >>>>> and where do I put it so I can compile? >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> Cheers. >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> David >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> On 2021/02/08 16:21:22, Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> >>> > >>>>> wrote: >>> > >>>>> > Hi David, >>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>>>> > don't use js:RemoteObject, use mx:RemoteObject from MXRoyale. >>> The >>> > >>>>> emulation >>> > >>>>> > version is far more complete while the first one still >>> requires more >>> > >>>>> work >>> > >>>>> > to be done. mx:RemoteObject can be considered 96% or so >>> completed ;) >>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>>>> > About the timing issue, please first use mx version and then we >>> > >>>>> could see >>> > >>>>> > if the problem continues. >>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>>>> > Also, think that we have "Virtual" layout versions, although >>> Jewel >>> > >>>>> > VirtualDataGrid is still not complete. >>> > >>>>> > If you don't need things like item renderer editing or column >>> > >>>>> ordering, I >>> > >>>>> > always recommend to use a simple Jewel List or VirtualList >>> with an >>> > >>>>> item >>> > >>>>> > renderer and a header, since is far simpler and performant. In >>> Flex >>> > >>>>> we used >>> > >>>>> > to overuse DataGrids. >>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>>>> > HTH >>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>>>> > El lun, 8 feb 2021 a las 16:54, David Slotemaker de Bruine (< >>> > >>>>> > [email protected]>) escribió: >>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>>>> > > Hey Guys, >>> > >>>>> > > >>> > >>>>> > > I have managed to get a Remote Object Call working to our >>> current >>> > >>>>> BlazeDS >>> > >>>>> > > backend using Jewel UI and js:RemoteObject, Great work >>> getting >>> > >>>>> that done! >>> > >>>>> > > >>> > >>>>> > > Some questions: >>> > >>>>> > > >>> > >>>>> > > I have make the call twice, the first one always returns a >>> Error >>> > >>>>> message >>> > >>>>> > > with the fault string "Detected duplicate HTTP-based >>> FlexSessions, >>> > >>>>> > > generally due to the remote host disabling session cookies. >>> > >>>>> Session cookies >>> > >>>>> > > must be enabled to manage the client connection correctly.". >>> I >>> > >>>>> also noticed >>> > >>>>> > > this event doesn't map the same way to the Fault event in >>> Flex. >>> > >>>>> The Fault >>> > >>>>> > > event in Flex has a faultString and rootCause property but >>> the >>> > >>>>> Royal >>> > >>>>> > > version doesn't have those 2 properties. How can I avoid the >>> > >>>>> double call >>> > >>>>> > > and get the faultString property to show to the user? >>> > >>>>> > > >>> > >>>>> > > The drawing of the result to the datagrid takes a massive >>> amount >>> > >>>>> of time, >>> > >>>>> > > the result is 500 object long, but it takes upwards of 40 >>> seconds >>> > >>>>> to fill >>> > >>>>> > > the datagrid, its mxml is: >>> > >>>>> > > >>> > >>>>> > > <j:DataGrid id="dg" width="1000" height="300"> >>> > >>>>> > > <j:columns> >>> > >>>>> > > >>> <j:DataGridColumn >>> > >>>>> > > label="Codigo" dataField="notesCliente" columnWidth="100"/> >>> > >>>>> > > >>> > >>>>> <j:DataGridColumn >>> > >>>>> > > label="Nombre" dataField="nombre" columnWidth="200"/> >>> > >>>>> > > >>> > >>>>> <j:DataGridColumn >>> > >>>>> > > label="Poblacion" dataField="poblacionNombre" >>> columnWidth="200"/> >>> > >>>>> > > >>> > >>>>> <j:DataGridColumn >>> > >>>>> > > label="GPS" dataField="direccionLatLong" columnWidth="100"/> >>> > >>>>> > > >>> > >>>>> <j:DataGridColumn >>> > >>>>> > > label="Mail" dataField="mail" columnWidth="100"/> >>> > >>>>> > > >>> > >>>>> <j:DataGridColumn >>> > >>>>> > > label="Tlfno" dataField="tlfno" columnWidth="100"/> >>> > >>>>> > > >>> > >>>>> <j:DataGridColumn >>> > >>>>> > > label="Cod.Admin" dataField="adminCliente" >>> columnWidth="100"/> >>> > >>>>> > > </j:columns> >>> > >>>>> > > </j:DataGrid> >>> > >>>>> > > >>> > >>>>> > > Anything I can do to speed it up? >>> > >>>>> > > >>> > >>>>> > > Cheers, >>> > >>>>> > > >>> > >>>>> > > David >>> > >>>>> > > >>> > >>>>> > > >>> > >>>>> > > >>> > >>>>> > > >>> > >>>>> > > >>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>>>> > -- >>> > >>>>> > Carlos Rovira >>> > >>>>> > Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC >>> > >>>>> > *Apache Software Foundation* >>> > >>>>> > http://about.me/carlosrovira >>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>> -- >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> Piotr Zarzycki >>> > >>>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> -- >>> > >>> >>> > >>> *David Slotemaker de Bruïne* >>> > >>> *Head of Educational Robotics* >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> Av. Sarriá, 130 - 08017 Barcelona >>> > >>> < >>> https://maps.google.com/?q=Av.+Sarri%C3%A1,+130+-+08017+Barcelona&entry=gmail&source=g >>> > >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> T. +34 932 523 729 ext. 135 >>> > >>> >>> > >>> [email protected] >>> > >>> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> -- >>> > >> >>> > >> Piotr Zarzycki >>> > >> >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > -- >>> > > >>> > > *David Slotemaker de Bruïne* >>> > > *Head of Educational Robotics* >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > Av. Sarriá, 130 - 08017 Barcelona >>> > > < >>> https://maps.google.com/?q=Av.+Sarri%C3%A1,+130+-+08017+Barcelona&entry=gmail&source=g >>> > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > T. +34 932 523 729 ext. 135 >>> > > >>> > > [email protected] >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > >>> > Piotr Zarzycki >>> > >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> Piotr Zarzycki >> > > > -- > > *David Slotemaker de Bruïne* > *Head of Educational Robotics* > > > > Av. Sarriá, 130 - 08017 Barcelona > <https://maps.google.com/?q=Av.+Sarri%C3%A1,+130+-+08017+Barcelona&entry=gmail&source=g> > > > T. +34 932 523 729 ext. 135 > > [email protected] > -- Piotr Zarzycki
