Send users mailing list submissions to
        [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        
http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/mailman/listinfo/users_rt2x00.serialmonkey.com

or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of users digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Status of rt539x support? (Gertjan van Wingerde)
   2. Re: 7 more packets after each beacon frame (Helmut Schaa)
   3. RT2880 project (bojan prtvar)
   4. Re: [PATCH 1/5] rt2x00: Minor optimizazion in txdone      path
      (Ivo Van Doorn)
   5. Re: [PATCH 1/5] rt2x00: Minor optimizazion in txdone      path
      (Helmut Schaa)
   6. Re: [PATCH 1/5] rt2x00: Minor optimizazion in txdone      path
      (Helmut Schaa)
   7. Re: [PATCH 1/5] rt2x00: Minor optimizazion in txdone      path
      (Ivo Van Doorn)
   8. Re: Status of rt539x support? (Sonny Piers)
   9. Re: Status of rt539x support? (RA-Shiang Tu)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 20:58:10 -0700
From: Gertjan van Wingerde <[email protected]>
To: Sonny Piers <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [rt2x00-users] Status of rt539x support?
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain;       charset=us-ascii

Hi Sonny,

On 4 sep. 2011, at 08:05, Sonny Piers <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> I wonder what is the status of rt539x support.
> I have read few months ago it was experimental, still the case?
> 
> I have tried rt2x00 with my rt5390 chipset the card is well-recognize and the 
> modules are correctly loaded by udev. However I get constantly disconnected 
> and sometimes it fails to scan.
> For the moment I use the driver from ralink but I would love replace it with 
> rt2x00.
> 

RT53xx support in rt2x00 was contributed by Ralink employees, however as we 
always do we give it state experimental until it has proven itself. 
Unfortunately it doesn't seem to work for you.

Does the driver emit any diagnostics in dmesg?

Also do you have the exact hardware details, i.e. Bus-type (usb or pcie), 
chipset as reported by hardware in dmesg, etc?

----
Gertjan

Sent from my iPad




------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 08:39:41 +0200
From: Helmut Schaa <[email protected]>
To: Andreas Hartmann <[email protected]>
Cc: rt2x00 Users List <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [rt2x00-users] 7 more packets after each beacon frame
Message-ID:
        <cagxe3d9zyl-b-ud0gpk9-bvq3ksfyqkhf4jbxagpg_xwfan...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi Andreas,

On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Andreas Hartmann
<[email protected]> wrote:
> The patch you sent didn't work (as I already wrote some days ago). Could
> you find another solution meanwhile? I don't think, that it's ok to
> always send out all potential beacons, even if they are not used at all.
> It's non stop 7 times more exposure then necessary. And it's a security
> issue as the data of this frame isn't well defined, but potentially
> something like a small memory dump.

Of course it's not ok to send these malformed beacons out but I didn't have
time to look into this further yet. A quick "solution" would be to just disable
AP mode on these devices to, or to disable Multi-BSSID mode on them.

I first need to reproduce this issue on a card similar to yours. I've got
one here but since I just moved I don't even have internet connectivity
at home yet :(

I'll try to find some time soon ...

Helmut



------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 11:13:09 +0200
From: bojan prtvar <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [rt2x00-users] RT2880 project
Message-ID:
        <caomt4ft8em26wmyy812qr5fslfrdulch0hg2v70ebdtdeih...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi all,

I'm involved in project based upon RT2880 module. The project is
mainly oriented in customizing existing user-space application but
since I have hardware on my desk and a will to learn, I wonder if
there is any space to contribute to rt2x00 project?
Running kernel is dated one (2.4.x), and proprietary Ralink driver is used.

Since I'm new to linux kernel programming, for now I can only think of
doing some testing depending on how well RT2880 is supported by the
main line kernel.
Any advice is appreciated.

Best regards,
Bojan



------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 12:48:04 +0200
From: Ivo Van Doorn <[email protected]>
To: Helmut Schaa <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [rt2x00-users] [PATCH 1/5] rt2x00: Minor optimizazion in
        txdone  path
Message-ID:
        <caozox0ukuqyosqxxark9stjrgzzwaxmwqkdzqn5kn7p6umw...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi,

> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800usb.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800usb.c
> @@ -542,7 +542,8 @@ static void rt2800usb_txdone(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?}
>
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?if (entry)
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? rt2800_txdone_entry(entry, reg);
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? rt2800_txdone_entry(entry, reg,
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? rt2800usb_get_txwi(entry));
> ? ? ? ?}
> ?}

Have I missed a patch, or have you forgotten to submit a patch?
This change doesn't apply, as in my rt2x00.git checkout
there is no if-statement on this location, and rt2800_txdone_entry
is called unconditionally.

Ivo



------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 13:23:12 +0200
From: Helmut Schaa <[email protected]>
To: Ivo Van Doorn <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [rt2x00-users] [PATCH 1/5] rt2x00: Minor optimizazion in
        txdone  path
Message-ID:
        <CAGXE3d-n=gvp1qbosg7omgozbh-u3wxqvat6p09qmbt_rqf...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Ivo Van Doorn <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800usb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800usb.c
>> @@ -542,7 +542,8 @@ static void rt2800usb_txdone(struct rt2x00_dev 
>> *rt2x00dev)
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?}
>>
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?if (entry)
>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? rt2800_txdone_entry(entry, reg);
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? rt2800_txdone_entry(entry, reg,
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? rt2800usb_get_txwi(entry));
>> ? ? ? ?}
>> ?}
>
> Have I missed a patch, or have you forgotten to submit a patch?

Uhh, I don't know, let me recheck. My patches were on top of wireless-testing
instead of rt2x00 git. Maybe something differed between those ...

Helmut



------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 13:30:25 +0200
From: Helmut Schaa <[email protected]>
To: Ivo Van Doorn <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [rt2x00-users] [PATCH 1/5] rt2x00: Minor optimizazion in
        txdone  path
Message-ID:
        <cagxe3d-lkm_wtmuedk79rpfqzdfltou15pomy-fujd0_h91...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Helmut Schaa
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Ivo Van Doorn <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Have I missed a patch, or have you forgotten to submit a patch?
>
> Uhh, I don't know, let me recheck. My patches were on top of wireless-testing
> instead of rt2x00 git. Maybe something differed between those ...

Yups, there was a patch from Stanislaw [1] that introduced this change.

Are you going to rebase rt2x00-git to wireless-testing or should I resend
based on current rt2x00 git?

Thanks,
Helmut

[1] 
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-testing.git;a=blobdiff;f=drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800usb.c;h=dbf501ca317f51cac690b87a0edb7f8a84145353;hp=2cb25ea13c522d53abe08e18f33d678d6145f9ba;hb=674db1344443204b6ce3293f2df8fd1b7665deea;hpb=df71c9cfceea801e7e26e2c74241758ef9c042e5



------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 16:16:27 +0200
From: Ivo Van Doorn <[email protected]>
To: Helmut Schaa <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [rt2x00-users] [PATCH 1/5] rt2x00: Minor optimizazion in
        txdone  path
Message-ID:
        <caozox0uif4bbpq-eamqwciftreq+vce7oztz-funlfvsmoj...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi,

On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Helmut Schaa
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Helmut Schaa
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Ivo Van Doorn <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Have I missed a patch, or have you forgotten to submit a patch?
>>
>> Uhh, I don't know, let me recheck. My patches were on top of wireless-testing
>> instead of rt2x00 git. Maybe something differed between those ...
>
> Yups, there was a patch from Stanislaw [1] that introduced this change.
>
> Are you going to rebase rt2x00-git to wireless-testing or should I resend
> based on current rt2x00 git?

Ah ok, don't worry I'll rebase rt2x00.git.

Ivo



------------------------------

Message: 8
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 00:57:00 +0200
From: Sonny Piers <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [rt2x00-users] Status of rt539x support?
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

On 09/05/2011 05:58 AM, Gertjan van Wingerde wrote:
> Hi Sonny,
>
> On 4 sep. 2011, at 08:05, Sonny Piers<[email protected]>  wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I wonder what is the status of rt539x support.
>> I have read few months ago it was experimental, still the case?
>>
>> I have tried rt2x00 with my rt5390 chipset the card is well-recognize and 
>> the modules are correctly loaded by udev. However I get constantly 
>> disconnected and sometimes it fails to scan.
>> For the moment I use the driver from ralink but I would love replace it with 
>> rt2x00.
>>
>
> RT53xx support in rt2x00 was contributed by Ralink employees, however as we 
> always do we give it state experimental until it has proven itself. 
> Unfortunately it doesn't seem to work for you.
>
> Does the driver emit any diagnostics in dmesg?
Every 10 seconds, more or less, it said the router hasen't answered 
within 500ms so I get disconnected.
I juste have switched back to the rt2x00 kernel module thinking I would 
be able to copy/past the exact dmesg diagnostic but I didn't get any 
error or wireless instability.
Might be fixed in a recent Kernel release?
>
> Also do you have the exact hardware details, i.e. Bus-type (usb or pcie), 
> chipset as reported by hardware in dmesg, etc?
lsusb:
Bus 006 Device 002: ID 148f:2000 Ralink Technology, Corp.
dmesg:
[ 7186.064818] usb 6-1: USB disconnect, device number 2
[ 7203.136233] usb 6-1: new full speed USB device number 3 using ohci_hcd

It's the built-in card shipped with the laptop HP Pavillon DM1 3130 (in 
Europe).

By the way, since I have disassembly my laptop I'm quit sure the WiFi 
chipset is on a mini PCI card, so I'm surprise my system recognize it as 
a USB device.

Cheers.


>
> ----
> Gertjan
>
> Sent from my iPad





------------------------------

Message: 9
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 01:28:29 +0000
From: RA-Shiang Tu <[email protected]>
To: Sonny Piers <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
        <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [rt2x00-users] Status of rt539x support?
Message-ID:
        <3cd5c4d3b07007449d2e692f161fee7109371...@twhcmbs02.tw.ralinktech.ad>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi Sonny,

I think that's a Bluetooth + WiFi combo device and the 148f:2000 is the 
Bluetooth device.
You can run lspci to check the PCI-E device id.

Besides, can you try it after disable the Bluetooth function?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Sonny Piers
> Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 6:57 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [rt2x00-users] Status of rt539x support?
>
> On 09/05/2011 05:58 AM, Gertjan van Wingerde wrote:
> > Hi Sonny,
> >
> > On 4 sep. 2011, at 08:05, Sonny Piers<[email protected]>  wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I wonder what is the status of rt539x support.
> >> I have read few months ago it was experimental, still the case?
> >>
> >> I have tried rt2x00 with my rt5390 chipset the card is
> well-recognize and the modules are correctly loaded by udev.
> However I get constantly disconnected and sometimes it fails to scan.
> >> For the moment I use the driver from ralink but I would
> love replace it with rt2x00.
> >>
> >
> > RT53xx support in rt2x00 was contributed by Ralink
> employees, however as we always do we give it state
> experimental until it has proven itself. Unfortunately it
> doesn't seem to work for you.
> >
> > Does the driver emit any diagnostics in dmesg?
> Every 10 seconds, more or less, it said the router hasen't
> answered within 500ms so I get disconnected.
> I juste have switched back to the rt2x00 kernel module
> thinking I would be able to copy/past the exact dmesg
> diagnostic but I didn't get any error or wireless instability.
> Might be fixed in a recent Kernel release?
> >
> > Also do you have the exact hardware details, i.e. Bus-type
> (usb or pcie), chipset as reported by hardware in dmesg, etc?
> lsusb:
> Bus 006 Device 002: ID 148f:2000 Ralink Technology, Corp.
> dmesg:
> [ 7186.064818] usb 6-1: USB disconnect, device number 2 [
> 7203.136233] usb 6-1: new full speed USB device number 3
> using ohci_hcd
>
> It's the built-in card shipped with the laptop HP Pavillon
> DM1 3130 (in Europe).
>
> By the way, since I have disassembly my laptop I'm quit sure
> the WiFi chipset is on a mini PCI card, so I'm surprise my
> system recognize it as a USB device.
>
> Cheers.
>
>
> >
> > ----
> > Gertjan
> >
> > Sent from my iPad
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/mailman/listinfo/users_rt2x00.s
> erialmonkey.com
>
CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT : The information, attachments and any rights 
attaching in this e-mail are confidential and privileged; it is intended only 
for the individual or entity named as the recipient hereof.Any disclosure, 
copying, distribution, dissemination or use of the contents of this e-mail by 
persons other than the intended recipient is STRICTLY PROHIBITED and may 
violate applicable laws.If you have received this e-mail in error, please 
delete the original message and notify us by return email or collect call 
immediately. Thank you.



------------------------------

_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/mailman/listinfo/users_rt2x00.serialmonkey.com


End of users Digest, Vol 31, Issue 6
************************************

Reply via email to