Thank you all for spontaneous reaction :o) Great ! The way I understand it the status is as follows:
The latest 1.3.xx release is ready for production, and so is the TB connector/integrator. This combination can be offered as a hosted multi-domain groupware solution. Funambol syncing is also to be considered to work on a production platform at this stage.
Outlook compatibility is still in beta. And even then it can only be used via LAN, not as a hosted solution where a local Outlook user connects to an external server over http(s) and synchronizes data from his local PC to the hosted server.
Correct? Just to know what expectations to have, and what we can promise our users we can deliver ;o)
Regards,
Harry
On Tuesday, January 17, 2012 05:08 PM CET, Ludovic Marcotte <[email protected]> wrote:
On 17/01/12 10:58, Julian Robbins wrote:
> But that said, I don't think it will be too long before it will be
> perfectly usable as a real alternative.
Everybody has different expectations.
SOGo is *already* an Exchange alternative - used in very (if not
extremely) large-scale environments.
When it comes to native Outlook compatibility, we have a radically
different approach. We never stated it was ready for production and
that's why we've created the "SOGo v2 branch" - to let people test it
quite easily (together with the ZEG/Outlook).
For those who want to offer hosted "native Outlook compatibility", the
"Outlook Anywhere" (RPC over HTTP) protocol will have to be added first
to the whole solution (mostly in Samba4).
Regards,
--
Ludovic Marcotte
[email protected] :: +1.514.755.3630 :: www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org)
--
[email protected]
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
