Hi, thanks for your thoughts. Just wanted to let you know that the developer of iCal4OL already fixed the bug (or better - non-deterministic behaviour) and now everything works as expected! Thanks, Andy
On Thursday 15 May 2014 14:38:32 Helge Hess wrote: > Ah, > > rereading my answer the issue is a bit different I guess ;-) (it still is a > bad idea to transmit vCard 2.1 to a CardDAV server though, should be v3 > minimum). > On May 15, 2014, at 2:01 PM, Helge Hess <[email protected]> wrote: > >> type "cell" phone numbers get synced to iphone as "work". > > No, this is not quite right, look at it: > >> outlook: TEL;CELL;WORK:+49 178 9xxxxx > > 'Work cell' phone numbers get synced as 'work'. Neither Outlook nor iOS can > differentiate between WORK;CELL and HOME;CELL, so they need to pick one > type and ignore the other. > > Looks like SOGo prefers CELL over WORK, and iOS the other way around (or > just takes the last type). In either case: whatever part emits the WORK as > part of the TEL of a generic CELL, is to be blamed ;-) > > hh -- [email protected] https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
