Is it not kosher to have both a /etc/procmailrc and a $USER/.procmailrc
here is my /etc/procmailrc
VERBOSE=yes MAILDIR=$HOME/Maildir/ DEFAULT=$HOME/Maildir/ LOGFILE=/var/log/procmaillog DROPPRIVS=yes COMSAT=no
:0fw
* < 256000
| spamc
# All mail tagged as spam (eg. with a score higher than the set threshold)
# is moved to "probably-spam".
# :0:
# * ^X-Spam-Flag: Yes
# /dev/null
# All mail tagged as spam (eg. with a score higher than the set threshold) # is moved to "probably-spam".
:0: * ^X-Spam-Flag: Yes $HOME/probably-spam/
#:0: #* ^Subject:.*[SPAM] #$HOME/probably-spam/
:0: * ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\* $HOME/probably-spam/
#### here is a users .procmailrc
:0: * ^X-Spam-Flag: Yes probably-spam/
#######
The problem is that some mail marked [SPAM] is ending up in $USER/Maildir/new It is clearly marked as spam but yet it goes to the wrong place.
I was getting non spam messages in the probably-spam bucket when using the Subject one but looking now it looks like it might need a X- in front of that one. oops or is that correct.
I read so many different docs and no two seem the same or authoratative. I have seen the :0 with and without the trailing : and that seems not to matter.
Should i just have a .procmail in the users home or only the one in /etc?
Thanks ahead.
-- Michael H. Collins Admiral, Penguinista Navy
http://linuxlink.com
/"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign \ / No HTML/RTF in email x No Word docs in email / \ Respect for open standards
The eye that looks ahead to the safe course is closed forever. -Paul Muad'Dib (Dune)
