On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, ChupaCabra wrote:
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 16 11:26:35 2004 > Subject: [SPAM] Christmas gift idea - Rolex Watch > Folder: > /home/correspondance/Maildir/new/1100625995.28492_1.mail.cho 5228 > procmail: [28493] Tue Nov 16 11:26:37 2004 > procmail: No match on "^X-Spam-Flag: Yes" > procmail: No match on "^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*" > procmail: Assigning > "PATH=/home/info/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin" > procmail: Rcfile: "/home/info/.procmailrc" > procmail: No match on "^X-Spam-Flag: Yes" > procmail: Assigning > "LASTFOLDER=/home/info/Maildir/new/1100625995.28493_1.mail.choiceinv.com" > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 16 11:26:35 2004 > Subject: [SPAM] Christmas gift idea - Rolex Watch > Folder: > /home/info/Maildir/new/1100625995.28493_1.mail.choiceinv.com 5218 > > ########## > > With [SPAM] in the subject this one still went to the good mail directory. > > Sometimes it does work though. > What am I missing here? Your recipes are looking at the X-Spam-Flag and X-Spam-Level headers, so the sorting is being done on that basis. It doesn't look like you have any rule looking at the Subject header, so it's irrelevant whether this header contains [SPAM] or not. -- Theodore (Ted) Heise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bloomington, IN, USA
