I do have scripts to go through 2 folders daily spam % ham but i noticed that although i add tons of messages to spam and some to ham its not enough to catch spam without URIBL or others like Razors.
>> Now, back to my ordinal question. >> Is >> >> http://wiki.junkemailfilter.com/index.php/Spam_DNS_Lists#Spam_Assassin_Examples >> good addition to fight spam or its DB is same as URIBL?Glad you got it >> sorted. > > I've added the hostkarma rules from junkmailfilter.com to my local ruleset > a couple years ago and they do help some. The magic in spamassassin is > lots of small scores add up to big scores so every little bit helps, in > both directions. In the last 30 days it's pushed 44 messages over the > edge. Not a lot, but every little bit helps. > > Long story short, it's worth adding then watching. Tailor the scores as > necessary to tune your system if the defaults aren't a good match for your > corpus of messages. > > ...Kevin > -- > Kevin Miller > Network/email Administrator, CBJ MIS Dept. > 155 South Seward Street > Juneau, Alaska 99801 > Phone: (907) 586-0242, Fax: (907) 586-4588 Registered Linux User No: > 307357 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Junk [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, December 01, 2017 9:55 AM > To: Kevin Miller > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: RE: FIlter > > Amazon does not block the dns but the URIBL blocks the requests coming > from the amazon subnet. I pointed the spamassasin to the server i run > somewhere else and i used the port 1053 as a workaround as ATT blocks > incoming udp 53. > > So 1053 on my firewall forwards to 53 dns server. > > Now spamassassin is happy and URIBL db works. > Thx for a tip about the DNS. > > > > > >
