> On Dec 2, 2017, at 12:53 PM, John Hardin <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sat, 2 Dec 2017, Junk wrote: > >>> If you trust your Bayes you might consider implementing a BAYES_999 rule >>> that adds another point. >> >> I might look into it >> >>> Getting past URIBL_BLOCKED will help. >> >> Yes once it started to work again there is less spam although i still get >> some that are formatted as images. > > BL lookups won't help with that... :
So is there a solution for this? >>> A lot of people trust the Zen DNSBL enough to do hard SMTP-time rejects of >>> those IPs. Not sure if you do that currently. >> >> Not sure about this. In the logs i see calls to ZEN. > > Which logs? > > SA will do Zen lookups by default. That says nothing about whether your *MTA* > is doing similar lookups at SMTP time and rejecting hits I was looking at the sa debug log when testing against spam message to see what is happening > -- > John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ > [email protected] FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [email protected] > key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79 > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > USMC Rules of Gunfighting #6: If you can choose what to bring > to a gunfight, bring a long gun and a friend with a long gun. > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > 5 days until The 76th anniversary of Pearl Harbor
