Do you know any additional lists that could be added in addition to: - built ones - http://wiki.junkemailfilter.com - razors
I have the spam score set to above to be 100% spam as i noticed what is below 5% sometimes falls into not a spam email. > I doubt anybody here is running spamassassin successfully w/o some > additional add-ons such as various RBLs, URIBLs, custom made rules, etc. > Some things I reject outright at the MTA, and what makes it through that > then has to run a gauntlet of spamassassin rules of all stripes. Since > it's so easy to adjust scores, when you add a new series of tests that > you're not sure about, it's probably a reasonable practice to change the > default scoring to something small - .01 maybe - then let it percolate for > a few days. After it's seen a bunch of messages, check to see which rules > hit, and then bump up the scores to levels are in line with your needs. > There's virtually no risk in that but it does take time... > > ...Kevin > -- > Kevin Miller > Network/email Administrator, CBJ MIS Dept. > 155 South Seward Street > Juneau, Alaska 99801 > Phone: (907) 586-0242, Fax: (907) 586-4588 Registered Linux User No: > 307357 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Junk [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, December 01, 2017 12:19 PM > To: Kevin Miller > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: RE: FIlter > > I do have scripts to go through 2 folders daily spam % ham but i noticed > that although i add tons of messages to spam and some to ham its not > enough to catch spam without URIBL or others like Razors. > > > >>> Now, back to my ordinal question. >>> Is >>> >>> http://wiki.junkemailfilter.com/index.php/Spam_DNS_Lists#Spam_Assassi >>> n_Examples good addition to fight spam or its DB is same as >>> URIBL?Glad you got it sorted. >> >> I've added the hostkarma rules from junkmailfilter.com to my local >> ruleset a couple years ago and they do help some. The magic in >> spamassassin is lots of small scores add up to big scores so every >> little bit helps, in both directions. In the last 30 days it's pushed >> 44 messages over the edge. Not a lot, but every little bit helps. >> >> Long story short, it's worth adding then watching. Tailor the scores >> as necessary to tune your system if the defaults aren't a good match >> for your corpus of messages. >> >> ...Kevin >> -- >> Kevin Miller >> Network/email Administrator, CBJ MIS Dept. >> 155 South Seward Street >> Juneau, Alaska 99801 >> Phone: (907) 586-0242, Fax: (907) 586-4588 Registered Linux User No: >> 307357 >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Junk [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Friday, December 01, 2017 9:55 AM >> To: Kevin Miller >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: RE: FIlter >> >> Amazon does not block the dns but the URIBL blocks the requests coming >> from the amazon subnet. I pointed the spamassasin to the server i run >> somewhere else and i used the port 1053 as a workaround as ATT blocks >> incoming udp 53. >> >> So 1053 on my firewall forwards to 53 dns server. >> >> Now spamassassin is happy and URIBL db works. >> Thx for a tip about the DNS. >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >
