On 1 Jan 2018, at 10:47, Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk> wrote: > >> On 1 Jan 2018, at 11:41 (-0500), Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >>> the gross format in RFCs 822,2822 and 5322 describes message-id consisting >>> of local and domain part, thus is must contain "@". > > On 01.01.18 12:17, Bill Cole wrote: >> No, it does not. Re-read the cited sections. From RFC5322, the ABNF >> definition: >> >> msg-id = [CFWS] "<" id-left "@" id-right ">" [CFWS] > > this is the part that says message-id must consist of local and domain > parts.
No, it doesn't say anything like that. As I already posted: > 5322 specifically states: "Though other algorithms will work, it is > RECOMMENDED that the right-hand side contain some domain identifier (either > of the host itself or otherwise) such that the generator of the message > identifier can guarantee the uniqueness of the left-hand side within the > scope of that domain." > > There is no requirement to include a local and domain part in any part of a > Message-ID. -- 'How come you know all that stuff?' 'I ain't just a pretty face.' 'You aren't even a pretty face, Gaspode.'
