On 04/09/2018 09:46 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Hi Dave,
I do similar work in MIMEDefang using the a redis backend for caching
valid recipients combined with Net::validMX that can check to see if a
sender has valid MX before sending. I have a release of Net::validMX
I'm about to post this week in fact.
If you are interested, let me know.
Regards,
KAM
I am interested in both learning MIMEDefang and your valid MX check.
--
Kevin A. McGrail
Asst. Treasurer & VP Fundraising, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 10:24 AM, David Jones <djo...@ena.com
<mailto:djo...@ena.com>> wrote:
I was wondering if anyone knows of an SA plugin or another method to
determine if the envelope-from domain has a valid MX record that is
listening on TCP port 25. I don't think it would be a major scorer
but it could be useful in meta rules.
Been playing around with rspamd over the weekend to see how it
compares and so far not that impressed. It has a few features that
are interesting like the MX check but other than that it's not as
impressive as the author makes it out to be on the website comparing
it to SA.
It claims to have better Bayes but so far I am seeing identical
results after identical training.
The Universal Configuration Language is terrible and hard to wrap
your head around it when the structure is so loose. Since it's not
well defined nor well documented it takes a lot of trial and error
to figure it out.
It doesn't seem to be as flexible as SA in many regards.
Right now I have rspamd only adding headers so I can compare with
SA. Tuning it out to match SA's accuracy is proving to be very
challenging and time consuming.
--
David Jones
--
David Jones
