On Thu, 15 Nov 2018, Amir Caspi wrote:
On Nov 15, 2018, at 2:36 PM, John Hardin <jhar...@impsec.org> wrote:
It doesn't seem to have a very high score just yet... I'm still getting FNs
with the rule hitting (due to those messages hitting BAYES_00/05).
Manually train those messages as spam and that should repair itself...
Actually... right now it looks like the rule still has the test score of 0.001
when network tests are enabled... is that correct or a bug?
That will cleanup after the network masscheck this weekend.
72_scores.cf: score HTML_ENTITY_ASCII 3.000 0.001 3.000
0.001
72_scores.cf: score HTML_ENTITY_ASCII_TINY 2.000 0.001 2.000
0.001
Seems like the score shouldn't depend on network tests, for this...
The score generation has to take into account the effect of hits from
other rules that *are* network-based.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
One unexpected benefit of time passing more quickly as you get older
is the perceived increase in the frequency of paychecks.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
595 days since the first commercial re-flight of an orbital booster (SpaceX)
