On Sat, 23 Feb 2019, RW wrote:
On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:37:30 -0600 (CST)
David B Funk wrote:
Is there a rule "score" syntax that allows you to use the score
assigned to an existing rule to calculate the value assigned to
another rule?
...
What I want to do is to create a local rule:
meta L_HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28_FIX ( HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28 && L_O365_USER )
describe L_HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28_FIX Fix damage from
HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28 for local O-365 users score
L_HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28_FIX ( -1.0 * HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28 )
IIWY I'd just redefine the HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_XX rules in the form
body __HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28 eval:html_image_only('2400','2800')
meta HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28 __HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28 && !L_O365_USER
That's one way, but given that HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28 is a core SA rule I'd prefer
not to hack at it.
I could totally over-ride it with local redefinitions but then I'd miss out on
any updates/improvements to the core rule defs and not know about it.
By just adding my local "repair" rule who's score is derived from that
calculation of the core rule def, I don't need to worry about updates damaging
my intended functionality.
EG: if the system rule is re-scored (up or down) my "repair" will still do the
right thing.
--
Dave Funk University of Iowa
<dbfunk (at) engineering.uiowa.edu> College of Engineering
319/335-5751 FAX: 319/384-0549 1256 Seamans Center
Sys_admin/Postmaster/cell_admin Iowa City, IA 52242-1527
#include <std_disclaimer.h>
Better is not better, 'standard' is better. B{
