To ignore it, as you say, I would have to remove the postfix check, write rules to implement a non-blocking check, then write rules to implement the rejection except for whitelisted domains. It is a lot of work, to allow a bank and an accounting firm to violate an industry standard, and still have the doubt on the authenticity of their e-mails. No thank you.
-------- Original Message -------- On 2 Aug 2020, 15:54, Kevin A. McGrail < [email protected]> wrote: On 8/2/2020 9:18 AM, Rupert Gallagher wrote: > They will procrastinate until the end of time unless we do something. > I tried hard, but they are lazy/ignorant/careless. Blacklisting would > trigger a problem with most of their customers, then they will try to > de-list at first, then they will comply when de-listing is rejected. If they aren't spending spam, why care about their MID or Helo format unless there is a delivery issue. This project exists to stop spam not to weaponize our capabilities to become the RFC-police. If the users have consent to receive the mail and the mail is getting to the right person, I'd recommend you ignore it. Regards, KAM -- Kevin A. McGrail [email protected] Member, Apache Software Foundation Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
