On Tue, 12 May 2026, Greg Troxel wrote:
Matija Nalis <[email protected]> writes:
The HTML_FONT_SIZE_HUGE is NOT triggering on my SA 3.4.1 with your
ham.000 (only HTML_MESSAGE and DMARC/etc stuff is).
3.4.1 is old and you are overdue for upgrade, but I can tell you know
that; mentioning it for other readers.
I know this might sound annoying (that is not my intention!); but are you sure
that:
It's fair; I ask the same sorts of questions.
- this is really the exact file you've checking with "spamassassin -D -t" ?
Really sure. The SPF stuff showed up as I was editing and rerunning. I
can see the input file in the output.
- that something in your extra rules did not override HTML_FONT_SIZE_HUGE test?
grepping local.cf I find nothing. So I'm as sure as I can be.
Well, maybe someone with SA 4.0.2 can check how it behaves for them;
maybe it's a bug there (maybe only on NetBSD?)
If I were you, I'd:
- wait a little if someone can reproduce the issue with SA 4.0.2
This has happened already, on Ubuntu 26.04. Thanks Andrew!
- however if bug is successfully reproduced in pristine NetBSD
Spamassassin 4.0.2, I'd fire up my editor and start adding dbg()
statements in that Mail/SpamAssassin/HTML.pm in anything
mentioning "size" (i.e. sub text_style() primarily) until I found
out what exactly is changing those $self->{max_size} and/or
$self->{min_size})
I think we have arrrived here, except it's not related to NetBSD. And,
so far we have zero reports of failure to repo with SA 4.0.2 on any
platform :-)
It could be related to perl 5.42.0 (just making that up).
I'm on
This is perl 5, version 40, subversion 1 (v5.40.1) built for
x86_64-linux-gnu-thread-multi
(with 48 registered patches, see perl -V for more detail)
so it is a little wider than just 5.42.0
--
Andrew C. Aitchison Kendal, UK
[email protected]
