Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Aecio F. Neto wrote on Thu, 14 Jul 2005 12:18:01 -0300: > > >>The problem is with this list that does relies its technics over *not >>reliable* listing services. > > > I understand, it wasn't clear to me you were really talking about this > very list. Sorry. Nevertheless, as you confirmed you are posting from > dynamic IP space. Use your provider's smarthost, almost everyone doesn't > accept mail from dynamic IP space nowadays.
Did Aecio confirm that Kai? AFAIK Aecio claims to be posting from a static IP. It's on DSL, but that doesn't make it dynamic (think business class DSL lines). However, Since the Brazilian Telecom that owns the IP block mixes and matches dynamic and static IP's at random, there's little to be done but treat the whole pool as dynamic. It's not like anyone (including SORBS) can have a ip-by-ip list of which ones are dynamic and static if the ISP is literally setting it up completely at random. I know that listing it all sucks, but there's very little that the rest of the world can do about the stupidity of the telco. Quite frankly, I feel that "Comite Gestor da Internet no Brasil" really isn't up to the task of being an ISP at all. Their general lack of response to abuse complaints, or even their own customer complaints is good evidence of that. And yes, I also know there's no real other choice in brazil, but that doesn't make the problem any less real (for people on both sides). If that telco wants to offer business-class static DSL lines, they should be in a separate CIDR block from the dynamic residential accounts.
