On 12/30/06, John Rudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
John D. Hardin wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Dec 2006, Larry Nedry wrote:
>
>> On 12/29/06 at 2:50 PM -0500 Vernon Webb wrote:
>>> What are you using?
>> Currently I am using only zen.spamhaus.org. The rest of the RBLs
>> that I have tried have had too many false positives to be useful
>> for my requirements.
>>
>> Which RBLs do the rest of you folks feel comfortable using?
>
> I use a few others from sorbs.net, but I don't see them having any
> effect as zen.spamhaus.org catches everything first... :)
>
I've been using sbl-xbl for a while, and then recently switched to zen.
I also recently added list.dsbl.org (called before zen, so I can see how
much it's really catching). It's pretty small (about 1/6 of what zen
catches).
I'm also contemplating adding dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net.
I tend to put the newest (to me) rbl first, so I can see what it's
actually catching before the stuff I was already using :-)
Hello,
we are using sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org, dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net, bl.spamcop.net
and list.dsbl.org in this particular order. The results are available
at:
http://graph.noc.ntua.gr/a/graph_529.html
Sbl-xbl(zen).spamhaus.org being first in the list and more complete
gets the most hits. Dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net does a pretty good job without
causing the problems of dnsbl.sorbs.net (too aggressive, weird
re-listing policy etc.). Bl.spamcop.net gets fewer hits, tends too be
aggressive sometimes (that's why we have combined rbls with a proper
whitelist) but also works as an early detector which is useful.
List.dsbl.org gets even fewer hits being last and smaller.
Regards,
Panagiotis
