Hmm, well now it's getting 6.4 from the commandline and seems to be
matching more appropriate rules. Maybe it was because I ran sa-update;
I'll keep you posted if more of them get through.
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Jeremy Morton wrote:
Here's an example of a spam message that got through my SA installation:
http://rafb.net/p/fcy9wY66.html
As you can see from the report header, this hasn't matched several
rules I think it should have done (like MIME_IMAGE_ONLY) - is my SA
installation screwed up or is there something in particular I need to
do to get that rule being matched?
What happens when you run that message through SA from the command line
in test mode with debugging turned on? Can you post the debug log from
that same message to pastebin?
