Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 17:26 +0100, Jeremy Morton wrote:
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
A: Because they are not defined. (See second half of this post.)
Where did you come across that rule at all? How did you get the
impression it should be in your stock install?
Would you mind contributing to this thread? Please do answer my
questions. They are not rhetorical, and I do ask them for a reason.
Thanks in advance for your cooperation.
I came across the rule because Adam Katz pasted me the results of *his*
SpamAssassin's analysis of a particular spam I got. This rule matched.
It seemed like an image-only email was the kind of thing that was very
sinister and that this kind of rule would've been added to SA a long
time ago. I guess I got that wrong, sorry. He must have added the rule
manually.
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
