On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 00:09 +0100, Jeremy Morton wrote:
> OK, didn't take long to get such an example. :-)
>
> http://rafb.net/p/rqOjCJ11.html
The paste(bin)? appears to be broken, every line that should be empty
actually shows a space there. Anyway, easy to fix.
Oh, and your X-Spam-Report header is broken. :)
> This made it through. As can be seen from the headers it got a 2.9
> score only and didn't match MIME_IMAGE_ONLY which certainly would have
> pushed it over the top.
Does match MIME_IMAGE_ONLY for me.
> When I tried passing it to SA on the command line using 'spamassassin
> -Lt < sample-email.txt' I got:
^^
> 0.1 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to trusted network by host with
> dynamic-looking rDNS
> 0.0 DYN_RDNS_AND_INLINE_IMAGE Contains image, and was sent by dynamic
> rDNS
>
> ... so virtually nothing matched. :-( Any ideas would be appreciated.
Ahem. You ran the manual test in -L local mode. That's why the network
tests are missing.
> Jeremy Morton wrote:
> > Hmm, well now it's getting 6.4 from the commandline and seems to be
> > matching more appropriate rules. Maybe it was because I ran sa-update;
Nope, you can safely run sa-update with the SA daemon up and running. No
problem.
What do you mean, "more appropriate" rules? Do you, or don't get any
hits on that rule if it should?
Did you --lint check? Did you do a -D debug run, to have a close look?
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
