Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, July 26, 2009 15:10, snowweb wrote:
>> Sorry Benny, my message wasn't very clear (although your information was
>> interesting). However, my main concern is that it is not using bayes to
>> analyse the messages, let alone to learn from them.
>
> sa-learn --dump magic
>
>> I've now trained bayes with well over 200 mails, using sa-learn but I'm
>> wondering if the parameters you mentions prevent it from learning even
>> when
>> using sa-learn since it still has not kicked in?
>
> there can be multiple tflags with noautolearn for the msg being tested, i
> just want to be sure you see same problem if scores is
> less then -0.1 or bigger then 12.1
>
> --
> xpoint
>
I love you guys! You're spot on everytime...
[r...@s1 Maildir]# sa-learn --dump magic
[9647] warn: FuzzyOcr: Cannot find executable for tesseract
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0 258 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0 160 0 non-token data: nham
0.000 0 26027 0 non-token data: ntokens
0.000 0 1245088823 0 non-token data: oldest atime
0.000 0 1248611169 0 non-token data: newest atime
0.000 0 1248614005 0 non-token data: last journal sync
atime
0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: last expiry atime
0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: last expire atime
delta
0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: last expire
reduction count
I see from that, that I've not trained as many HAM as I thought! OK, I'm off
in search of some more HAM! Thanks guys.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/bayes-not-active-although-enabled--tp24663548p24666952.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
