>> Benny Pedersen wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sun, July 26, 2009 15:29, snowweb wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 0.000          0        258          0  non-token data:
>>>> nspam
>>>> 0.000          0        160          0  non-token data:
>>>> nham
>>> 
>>> try to have them more or less equal to have good bayes
>>> db 
>>> 
>>> so if less then 1000 in diff is fine
>>> 
>>> if more then 1000 adjust learning scores
>>> 
>>>> I see from that, that I've not trained as many HAM as I
>>>> thought! OK, I'm off
>>>> in search of some more HAM! Thanks guys.
>>> 
>>> super you found the problem finaly
>>> 
>>> --
>>> xpoint
>>> 
>> 
>> Sorry, it hasn't solved it :(
>> 
>> As you can see below, I now have more than 200 of both
>> SPAM & HAM trained:
>> 
>> [r...@s1 Maildir]# sa-learn --dump magic
>> [1644] warn: FuzzyOcr: Cannot find executable for
>> tesseract
>> 0.000          0          3          0  non-token data:
>> bayes db version
>> 0.000          0        278          0  non-token data:
>> nspam
>> 0.000          0        221          0  non-token data:
>> nham
>> 0.000          0      34120          0  non-token data:
>> ntokens
>> 0.000          0 1245088823          0  non-token data:
>> oldest atime
>> 0.000          0 1248616170          0  non-token data:
>> newest atime
>> 0.000          0 1248620830          0  non-token data:
>> last journal sync atime
>> 0.000          0          0          0  non-token data:
>> last expiry atime
>> 0.000          0          0          0  non-token data:
>> last expire atime delta
>> 0.000          0          0          0  non-token data:
>> last expire reduction count
>> 
>> but here are the spam headers of a message, which show
>> that bayes is not being used:
>> 
>> X-Spam-Flag: NO
>> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01)
>> on s1.snowweb.info X-Spam-Level: ******
>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.0 required=4.7
>> tests=RELAYCOUNTRY_US autolearn=no version=3.2.4
>> X-Spam-Report:
>>     * 3.0 RELAYCOUNTRY_US Relayed through United States
>> of America
>>     * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
>> X-Spam-Relay-Country: US US US US US US US US US
>> 
>> This is not a random event. Bayes is not being used for
>> any message.
> 
> Which user you run the spam check with? sa-learn shows
> root's magic. If use for example use user spam to check
> the spam, you should call sa-learn as  
> 
>     sa-learn -u spam --dump magic

One can also use

    bayes_sql_override_username spam

in local.cf, if the bayes is in a SQL database. I have that, and there seems to 
be no difference if I use -u or not.


Reply via email to