Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, July 26, 2009 15:29, snowweb wrote:
>
>> 0.000 0 258 0 non-token data: nspam
>> 0.000 0 160 0 non-token data: nham
>
> try to have them more or less equal to have good bayes db
>
> so if less then 1000 in diff is fine
>
> if more then 1000 adjust learning scores
>
>> I see from that, that I've not trained as many HAM as I thought! OK, I'm
>> off
>> in search of some more HAM! Thanks guys.
>
> super you found the problem finaly
>
> --
> xpoint
>
Sorry, it hasn't solved it :(
As you can see below, I now have more than 200 of both SPAM & HAM trained:
[r...@s1 Maildir]# sa-learn --dump magic
[1644] warn: FuzzyOcr: Cannot find executable for tesseract
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0 278 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0 221 0 non-token data: nham
0.000 0 34120 0 non-token data: ntokens
0.000 0 1245088823 0 non-token data: oldest atime
0.000 0 1248616170 0 non-token data: newest atime
0.000 0 1248620830 0 non-token data: last journal sync
atime
0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: last expiry atime
0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: last expire atime
delta
0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: last expire
reduction count
but here are the spam headers of a message, which show that bayes is not
being used:
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on s1.snowweb.info
X-Spam-Level: ******
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.0 required=4.7 tests=RELAYCOUNTRY_US autolearn=no
version=3.2.4
X-Spam-Report:
* 3.0 RELAYCOUNTRY_US Relayed through United States of America
* 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
X-Spam-Relay-Country: US US US US US US US US US
This is not a random event. Bayes is not being used for any message.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/bayes-not-active-although-enabled--tp24663548p24667935.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
