On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 23:56 -0700, Linda Walsh wrote:
> May I point out, that while you may find the language crude -- it isn't
> language that would violate FTC standards in that in used any of the
> 7 or so 'unmentionable words'...
It's not about words on their own -- it's about how they are being used,
and their meaning in context.
> BTW, I've never even 'heard' or seen his name before this post.
Must have been a warm and cozy place, the rock you've been hiding
under. ;) You missed a 3 digit figure of posts and uncalled-for
off-topic rants within a few weeks.
> If I was talking with [...] I just apply my linguistic filter and
> attempt to get the meaning.
Sic.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
