Le 13/12/2010 09:04, Matus UHLAR - fantomas a écrit :
as far as I know, linkedin mail comes from linkedin domains, and has
valid DKIM sigs.
Yep, I'm pretty certain of that too. I think I have a rule that scores
on coming from linkedin, but without verified dkim signature.
now the question is, if we know it's an linkedin invitation, if we need to
verify DKIM at all ;)
depends on your users.
if it's your own hobby mail system, you can block linkedin, facebook,
twitter, hotmail, yahoo, ... etc. nobody will complain ;-p
mouss wrote:
the sample posted by Michelle came to her via a debian list. debian
lists are open (no subscription required) and thus attract a lot of
spam.
On 13.12.10 08:17, Per Jessen wrote:
And whilst invitations such as those broadcasted are annoying, they're
not _really_ spam, are they?
they are UBE, I'm not sure if that means spam to you...
if we're talking about messages sent by/via debian lists, they are not
unsollicited. you only receive them if you subscribe to debian lists.
The rule is: if you subscribe to a mailing list, then be prepared to
receive mail from that list, be it mail you are interested in or not
(same goes for "solicited", "desired", ...).
if we're about invitations received directly from linkedin, then they
are not necessarily bulk nor necessarily unsollicited. it would be
better to give real examples (evidence) so that we can talk about the
same thing.
