On 01/24/2011 11:59 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > Anyway, there's nothing we can do, unless you provide the full SA > headers at least. Maybe even a life sample, with those headers of > course.
I just sent myself a short test message with the afformentioned attachement and I get this SA report from MailScanner. Is that what you'd like to see? If not how do I get it? 0.80 BAYES_50 2.30 MANGLED_BEST mangled best 2.30 MANGLED_CNFDTL mangled confidential 2.30 MANGLED_DELIVY mangled delivery 2.30 MANGLED_FORM mangled form 2.30 MANGLED_FREE mangled free 2.30 MANGLED_FROM mangled from 2.30 MANGLED_GOOD mangled good 2.30 MANGLED_MEDS mangled med(s) 2.30 MANGLED_MEN mangled men 2.30 MANGLED_NAIL mangled nail 2.30 MANGLED_OFF mangled off 2.30 MANGLED_PLEASE mangled please 2.30 MANGLED_WORKS mangled work(s) 2.30 MANGLED_YOUR mangled your 1.50 MIME_ASCII0 Message body contains ASCII-0 character 0.50 MIME_BAD_LINEBREAK Message body with fishy line breaks 0.20 MR_NOT_ATTRIBUTED_IP Beta rule: an non-attributed IPv4 found in headers 0.50 NO_RDNS Sending MTA has no reverse DNS (Postfix variant) 0.50 ONE_WORD_SUBJECT Subject with only one lower-case word Met vriendelijke groet, Han Boetes -- Utelisys
