On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 13:59:48 +0100 Han Boetes <hboe...@utelisys.com> wrote:
> On 01/24/2011 11:59 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > > Anyway, there's nothing we can do, unless you provide the full SA > > headers at least. Maybe even a life sample, with those headers of > > course. > > I just sent myself a short test message with the afformentioned > attachement and I get this SA report from MailScanner. Is that what > you'd like to see? If not how do I get it? > > 0.80 BAYES_50 > 2.30 MANGLED_BEST mangled best > 2.30 MANGLED_CNFDTL mangled confidential > 2.30 MANGLED_DELIVY mangled delivery > 2.30 MANGLED_FORM mangled form > ... The MANGLED_* rules are non-standard, if you wish to keep them I would suggest rewriting them as meta-rules.
